Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6293A1198 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XFL9kqdNR0eM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420DB3A1196 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id b17so10479507pgh.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=WxYKlbpwh0jcm/lPwU2YeOv2thZstmJamlWhgtOOcFE=; b=jdl7K2Iz/r5tTKPR1TKFP4I8yfWrreVq8WD1aoAGVeUouZIIYL1+6uBXnlPlsOOS8N VApTZ0P4cyHXu9KxmNb2cKnQz/Kxc27kMaY1lys8vUY5905li51y8t68yAQ964puFWA8 dFuhcSXPIskQR5AISoylAfoUIsemi6PahNH/A9aHu3ItkFWrJu1ajOk0g0prg7LoBuq5 Qat5dwH4ans5swqhHuznP20HkykdhZSgnTpx2rs1boDAzG0mOCPzRjULPjag/hPdqx2h 9Itwfk4B98NGWIU6fmtWWSCKWo7oMsn/ESvZ+HWcvtS3EtCwv7sxFOyn6IAk3gqJmp2U a43g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=WxYKlbpwh0jcm/lPwU2YeOv2thZstmJamlWhgtOOcFE=; b=arvs+Js3Wk7t5kwvbU5p0ua91ey23n4pygY33zn3XcD636LtqNUEcAZ37u+3BgFO2u 5CzsLiMIoRXfA2zYMGvK+sRt9n/t5GzyspwVcY7yKG/V+H3hKvGGd9kVA/rGO60c8txI f/xT/hgPw2xOiTrt9iQExdZkmvzfwjj14NkKAC93sa9Fvy/z2IfxGOf0PccBkyzevhFs EYZFbxr1yJ4gT1EalYu0T8CsqigI/h8ucn/gIl9p5SYCWqVpb9evUdyuA1XBZgsRZwgX QTw7DZxg1fZuygebYkykqn8F7OuvqEAnJjYbL0oJlkdarXaI0qsFqkIkg6eR157kLtKV V3hg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kI4QGQbiRQeRftPe68/ytX/f8B33uKfpkxJdFrH9uqy/EzBl2 D+TXS7RkSkEZpF4AGHrUK5+0Bg3Q0Q282Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzsGMkGmAwgrMZTvaulL4Dg3X3awHpTE+GAVfx2Fu6TsI6+MqqaAgvzIu4iSBar9n9c+14gJg==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8e52:0:b029:23e:5c6e:61f8 with SMTP id d18-20020aa78e520000b029023e5c6e61f8mr27024810pfr.16.1618265853989; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-38-56.volcanocom.com. [107.182.38.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fv9sm389165pjb.23.2021.04.12.15.17.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
References: <YHMc54xe1Mnx2U2y@straasha.imrryr.org> <CABrd9SShpOnSpshnMZSag4ZVp6ic5tURFoH9RzT0WCXDHyxgkA@mail.gmail.com> <YHN5ObR0eqea8Mrc@straasha.imrryr.org> <CABrd9SRdw9baHD5-j9nz4Zv5JjfL35TgaTvS787orEyGxZdKzA@mail.gmail.com> <YHOAzeOj1JaGdmsO@straasha.imrryr.org> <5e91c054-5935-df07-e8ba-09cc78f6c950@network-heretics.com> <YHPSP8Kij2K4v7qQ@straasha.imrryr.org> <82c5fcc6-b419-6efb-b682-b5dbb32905e2@network-heretics.com> <585D8590-472B-4CBC-8292-5BE85521DD76@gmail.com> <a6545baf-b15e-3690-d7b5-be33c4078e02@mtcc.com> <20210412221435.GV9612@localhost>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <0755b70e-cc8e-3404-73cd-51950b3d7e53@mtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:17:32 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210412221435.GV9612@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yCrPm9C6M9TWu7Qkl0rrUsQ4lMQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:17:41 -0000

On 4/12/21 3:14 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:04:32PM -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> On 4/12/21 5:39 AM, Petite Abeille wrote:
>>> As it stands — one has to get out of its way to find it.
>>>
>>> dnsimple has good support for it out-of-the-box:
>>>
>>> https://support.dnsimple.com/articles/dnssec/
>>>
>>> https://dnssec-analyzer.verisignlabs.com/textprotocol.com
>>> https://dnssec-analyzer.verisignlabs.com/textprotocol.net
>>>
>> One of the interesting revelations is that:
>>
>> 1) Google implemented DANE at one point in Chrome
>>
>> 2) Google doesn't currently sign their zone
>>
>> The implication being that it wasn't a very serious effort to see what would
>> happen if they don't even sign their own domain.
> (1) may have been because of (2), and I believe (2) was because of
> internal technical and political issues.  I.e., I would not consider it
> dispositive that Google seemed to like DANE then gave up on it, though
> that and why they did certainly is germane.

Yes, that's what I would assume as well. Build it and they will come has 
a sterling track record of failure in IETF.

Mike