Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 25 July 2014 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393891A0271 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zoERNTC3igYu for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22e.google.com (mail-we0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70AC11A0028 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x48so4271555wes.33 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=J5lPNM2YFCtvLtihQGzq+k1bkBeX6RGB8sc8CJyaN3I=; b=yRSuL6+CtVBI1iIiyW9h+Hq4OBs0Hncl/Id1NQ1fSFqo0nAF30DFpy/2dU17HlARD1 wTMSB+t+iGkPrpG6Bd9m54+D93E5rv14PgGMvPuSJFxV7zOc+yTLaqzx027yWqJ9fN5w +s8CuCDy3kQGInbqn2V73V6k5FGwVbhdYhqDs8jQ70WGHT7/xnY1qrAgTa7rKWBFTWVE BecaoTwXLQooaLsF2YHw3j5aGTTDJm6QXMRpTDR2wfOgDMJugenLvVoPCCjN4c+QQMPc RZEnJRxEyn0W5lGwnHMVBE4vJI/DVg1R/aQ7+DPsTXwx/7nkYmmM5FQ7YdWR3ZXFx2cG G8zA==
X-Received: by 10.180.182.131 with SMTP id ee3mr4661839wic.37.1406291769944; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.160.177] (dhcp-a0b1.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.160.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hp6sm5459806wib.23.2014.07.25.05.36.07 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53D24F41.7030006@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 00:36:17 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com> <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org> <FA4238C4-ADDC-435F-9591-E3B074C2F6F6@vigilsec.com> <53CD2300.5050307@acm.org> <20140721143105.GH16966@mx1.yitter.info> <53CD291E.1020801@acm.org> <9045EC0A-E123-4CDC-B87F-5BC32C644C85@istaff.org> <53CD57E8.4000909@acm.org> <B7163126-31B6-4CC6-A711-F225051C294A@istaff.org> <53CD8F41.9060909@gih.com> <53CD939D.5020001@cisco.com> <9DE8F705-9748-407D-8E77-7B787ACD9873@gmail.com> <53CE4B39.1090202@acm.org> <53D016B6.20200 00@gih.com> <53D01E6B.8020606@gmail.com> <53D025F3.5050708@acm.org> <53D02828.1030805@gmail.com> <53D02D53.6070501@acm.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20140724012237.0ce22978@resistor.net> <9DBA0ECE-D26D-463F-858A-B990B68BDDD1@istaff.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20140724084607.0bb21040@elandnews.com> <9A1009CB-2617-4809-A318-11DCD34E6504@istaff.org> <53D1C521.3030809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <53D23F93.4050002@gmail.com> <2FD26F0B-73B4-4D01-9FC8-F4351609435B@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <2FD26F0B-73B4-4D01-9FC8-F4351609435B@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/HG8HBe1Vq2bLnsnUtOfYWgQH5nw
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org, =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:36:13 -0000

Steve,

You're quoting from a discussion of a strawman hypothetical case as if
were an assertion about the real world. I meant that if such a situation
were to arise, it would mean that there had been a failure of coordination.

We'd be better off having this conversation in French with correct
use of the conditional subjunctive ;-).

Regards
   Brian

On 25/07/2014 23:47, Steve Crocker wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> ICANN is working on a new round of gTLDs or some such. Of course they
>>> exclude already reserved TLDs, but not stuff that might be coming up
>>> (because they don't know it).
>> That's already a failure of coordination.
> 
> I don’t understand the basis for the above statements.
> 
> ICANN has not yet begun formulating the next round of gTLDs.  As part of the process, there will be consultation on what issues arose during the first round.  Consultation with the IETF re current and future reserved names is definitely and obviously part of what needs to be included.
> 
> There are multiple avenues of coordination between the IETF and ICANN.  The coordination is broad and deep.  Some of it is structural and some is pragmatic.  It is ongoing and effective.  The last important incident of uncoordinated activity that I’m aware was in another dimension entirely, viz the scheduling of meetings, and that was dealt with quite firmly.
> 
> Steve
> 
>