Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09A51A026A for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRZ55lXpkC-F for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77D9B1A006B for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=561; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1405981598; x=1407191198; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1ifr/gW1RwzImmWHHSU0854Be9O/K3QsVDh5RoWhEnY=; b=go4y8TSkPpmFOSRC9A8EqyHheAzJ8vzwge4IJZnX6NqZzL3qJS14tAxv d3AaTcHT25Q/R6cN17SPn8btLmq7PZJ70KSLBIDlguzRhLCWB+C0Tqq32 nOUA7aKod9uPfnPa8JKZuJRkQC6BrUrUHsLjLS5sfO1MRG+zx5R6qqSuW 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqIEAGiSzVOtJssW/2dsb2JhbABZhy/LSwGBMHaEBAEBBCNVARALGAICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBgEMAQcBARCILqgZlyAXgSyNS1QHgniBTgEEmyWHFY0ag2Ah
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,704,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="119421454"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2014 22:26:35 +0000
Received: from [10.86.240.218] (che-vpn-cluster-1-218.cisco.com [10.86.240.218]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6LMQYd5003238; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:26:34 GMT
Message-ID: <53CD939D.5020001@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:26:37 -0400
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com> <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org> <FA4238C4-ADDC-435F-9591-E3B074C2F6F6@vigilsec.com> <53CD2300.5050307@acm.org> <20140721143105.GH16966@mx1.yitter.info> <53CD291E.1020801@acm.org> <9045EC0A-E123-4CDC-B87F-5BC32C644C85@istaff.org> <53CD57E8.4000909@acm.org> <B7163126-31B6-4CC6-A711-F225051C294A@istaff.org> <53CD8F41.9060909@gih.com>
In-Reply-To: <53CD8F41.9060909@gih.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/IAg1nttHFlgRa8rD0q2VC_hwepc
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:26:40 -0000

Olivier,

On 7/21/14, 6:08 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> Is there going to also be a study of accountability mechanisms for
> each of the parties administering each parameter space?

Certainly the community should review our existing model to decide what
needs to change.  But we should be mindful that we do have a functioning
service, and some principles that were reviewed on this list and
presented in London that do guide us.  I also think the proposed charter
that Andrew put out makes pretty clear what needs to be reviewed.

Eliot