Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available

Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> Mon, 21 July 2014 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <avri@acm.org>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5971A00F1 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.465
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dm2Aa-ronnfL for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob15.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob15.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FC21A000E for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.204]) by atl4mhob15.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6LEQEhb032047 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:26:14 -0400
Received: (qmail 8012 invoked by uid 0); 21 Jul 2014 14:26:14 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 68.15.42.104
X-Authenticated-UID: avri@ella.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (avri@ella.com@68.15.42.104) by 0 with ESMTPA; 21 Jul 2014 14:26:14 -0000
Message-ID: <53CD2300.5050307@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:26:08 -0400
From: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internetgovtech@iab.org
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com> <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org> <FA4238C4-ADDC-435F-9591-E3B074C2F6F6@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <FA4238C4-ADDC-435F-9591-E3B074C2F6F6@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140721-0, 07/21/2014), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/Zjnf4Soa5sD2LonEYDUsV1faenA
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:26:25 -0000

Hi,

> 
> The IETF community will be responsible for the proposal for protocol
> parameters. I expect that interested individuals will be working with
> the name community or the numbers community to make sure that the
> right things are happening in each of those proposals as well.
> Coordination will be needed where there is overlap, such as anycast
> addresses and special-purpose names.  That said, once the whole
> proposal is stitched together, it will be reviewed by all three
> communities and many other interested parties.
> 
>

Is that what the community as a whole has decided or just what is
decreed by the ICG.

I fund this silo approach very problematic and more likely to produce a
disjointed set of solutions - leaving too much power to the ICG to fit
things as it sees fit. But time will tell and if it has been decided by
the powers-that-be, I guess I will just have to live with it.

avri