Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community

Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> Fri, 25 July 2014 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <steve@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007351B27CF for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DSL=1.129, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tAXDRdXuisEq for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from execdsl.com (remote.shinkuro.com [50.56.68.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BB61B27B5 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dummy.name; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:47:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <53D23F93.4050002@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:47:20 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2FD26F0B-73B4-4D01-9FC8-F4351609435B@shinkuro.com>
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com> <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org> <FA4238C4-ADDC-435F-9591-E3B074C2F6F6@vigilsec.com> <53CD2300.5050307@acm.org> <20140721143105.GH16966@mx1.yitter.info> <53CD291E.1020801@acm.org> <9045EC0A-E123-4CDC-B87F-5BC32C644C85@istaff.org> <53CD57E8.4000909@acm.org> <B7163126-31B6-4CC6-A711-F225051C294A@istaff.org> <53CD8F41.9060909@gih.com> <53CD939D.5020001@cisco.com> <9DE8F705-9748-407D-8E77-7B787ACD9873@gmail.com> <53CE4B39.1090202@acm.org> <53D016B6.20200 00@gih.com> <53D01E6B.8020606@gmail.com> <53D025F3.5050708@acm.org> <53D02828.1030805@gmail.com> <53D02D53.6070501@acm.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20140724012237.0ce22978@resistor.net> <9DBA0ECE-D26D-463F-858A-B990B68BDDD1@istaff.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20140724084607.0bb21040@elandnews.com> <9A1009CB-2617-4809-A318-11DCD34E6504@istaff.org> <53D1C521.3030809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <53D23F93.4050002@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/ScKpU8-4upM_FRfu6wr2jIOmtvs
Cc: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, internetgovtech@iab.org, "Stephen D. Crocker" <steve@shinkuro.com>, =?windows-1252?Q?=22Martin_J=2E_D=FCrst=22?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:47:23 -0000

On Jul 25, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

>> ICANN is working on a new round of gTLDs or some such. Of course they
>> exclude already reserved TLDs, but not stuff that might be coming up
>> (because they don't know it).
> 
> That's already a failure of coordination.

I don’t understand the basis for the above statements.

ICANN has not yet begun formulating the next round of gTLDs.  As part of the process, there will be consultation on what issues arose during the first round.  Consultation with the IETF re current and future reserved names is definitely and obviously part of what needs to be included.

There are multiple avenues of coordination between the IETF and ICANN.  The coordination is broad and deep.  Some of it is structural and some is pragmatic.  It is ongoing and effective.  The last important incident of uncoordinated activity that I’m aware was in another dimension entirely, viz the scheduling of meetings, and that was dealt with quite firmly.

Steve