Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available

Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> Mon, 21 July 2014 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <avri@acm.org>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC351A000B for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.812
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.812 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfuP2Es6NYep for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob17.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob17.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.110]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B671A0024 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.208]) by atl4mhob17.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6LE7Ia7014391 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:07:18 -0400
Received: (qmail 19045 invoked by uid 0); 21 Jul 2014 14:07:15 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 68.15.42.104
X-Authenticated-UID: avri@ella.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (avri@ella.com@68.15.42.104) by 0 with ESMTPA; 21 Jul 2014 14:07:15 -0000
Message-ID: <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:07:06 -0400
From: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internetgovtech@iab.org
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140721-0, 07/21/2014), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/OwJAeylSrqI7L8-ini780r2lNhI
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:08:44 -0000

Hi,

> 
> The ICG charter:
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-charter-coordination-group-17jun14-en.pdf


I have a question of the slice and dice methodology for the topics into
3 categories.

Does the IETF, though it includes the protocol work on DNS and the tools
to support the likes of WHOIS functionality and the design on numbering
systems, plan to only contribute 'outputs' on protocol parameters?

Not commenting for now on the orphan issues - things NTIA stewards a
that don't fit into any of the 3 defined operational groups.  that is a
problem for other messages.

I understand why various organization may be the ones to take the first
shot and even the lead on various issues, I am concerned that we
building walls to who can prodice recommendations that need to be
coordinated on which aspects.  I think that silo orientation is a losing
methodology and is one that put too much control in the hands of the IGC.

avri