Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528591A01E6 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nzTYxviGtOR9 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDA781A01AC for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so6845007wgh.5 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QfWnZbecPIQPCBgfiN8kFUfb//vyh9DMKI7r6mCuuXw=; b=FVPi6RlpHhepi8Zs9XcBwBpFtpA72ec3a+vnMt0Ia9+NEXQjJ42SaW083yHLUzpd4H 4cx/OKN47J8Ml5BKrJitD5pWU8bheRRkEKRVJqfIDlyqO6rbm0RrZX9nF6VrH8XpAXfQ 0sYSF02KMmdu2H/2NxKDHYU5aeG9q5IkP4jY81WMa7wrnUcYLSe7cyyCnkn19OucCmsM 3zPXgsSoPF41050VdkLdRC9E7iXV4uixu1pjvlYdsG6x6VEiZ1uCRHxHsTLiXP9qzpl3 Jdbtp9LmQlPxUksz7g+n91IFt5WCaHSMbwqOgcMoIxZqEnrNmayNY968Ieaolx9KtPXP vhdA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.19.200 with SMTP id h8mr6647647wie.32.1405964019444; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.162.195 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.162.195 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <74A399C5-BDA0-4DDB-A52A-BC2F6D98222F@istaff.org>
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com> <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org> <FA4238C4-ADDC-435F-9591-E3B074C2F6F6@vigilsec.com> <53CD2300.5050307@acm.org> <20140721143105.GH16966@mx1.yitter.info> <53CD291E.1020801@acm.org> <74A399C5-BDA0-4DDB-A52A-BC2F6D98222F@istaff.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:33:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6iKWYMTWHDvmo2YXWfWAniLhNYKzyESB+-5i2L=sw=+dg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec53d5eb7f2305c04feb781c6"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/LN4tmvchLceMvbumx4YMsPMmkHE
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org, avri <avri@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:33:44 -0000

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 21 Jul 2014 17:09, "John Curran" <jcurran@istaff.org> wrote:

 From how I read the process, any
> such input will be considered by the ICG, and potentially provided back to
> the appropriate operational community for consideration; this is
regardless
> of its origin.
>
If I may ask where is the process that "anyone" will take to provide input
indicated?

Thanks

Cheers!
 (Of course, that's just my take based on the charter just
> published, I am not in London/Toronto nor part of the ICG.)
>
> Do you read it differently?
> /John
>
> Disclaimer:  My views alone - no IANA accountability mechanisms are
proposed
>              by way of this email.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internetgovtech mailing list
> Internetgovtech@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech