Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ocl@gih.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB771A0135 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WPRMTZO-D5QJ for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waikiki.gih.co.uk (salsa.gih.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:19e8:10:5::b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1191A00A9 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waikiki.gih.co.uk (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by waikiki.gih.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4FA18F3C8; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:08:01 +0100 (BST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gih.com; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mahalo1; bh=r5dSWWpwC hzHHRCvOIYEgk0HFeg=; b=oiVYAKr85J5ebRaRnAyozm5XxePEJYBdQSaBxTdjk pHb3PeWVHkH2WcixH/IxKsI2QCYpxx3oW+xduNWkqZ5I0YOM83eXO/36pFYdP2Xt 5uFLqDmCSFeMzYRh2KhurF6Q2HKTWQLabsAtD9zz6LsUGwc13Iy+W4arUWBp1GGD vk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gih.com; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mahalo1; b=VgB SthLlO/bQvV0gGQcKGVEiA2sjWooPG7BlDtAy+nQP8U6tt/8ySTk0sNmQ7Q0DMy9 zPaAIK/s16uwxgWUOmj8eddpys+K6FLwGQ6zfSSbSNjur5TPPAoPpApqJ8gUxRAO S5yYQ57WtVE6IpDFSo1yTfbkWvvaJCbH6vAaTk/w=
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:120b:2c79:4e00:4895:44ab:65aa:afc8] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:120b:2c79:4e00:4895:44ab:65aa:afc8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by waikiki.gih.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF67118F3C5; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:08:00 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <53CD8F41.9060909@gih.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:08:01 +0200
From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com> <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org> <FA4238C4-ADDC-435F-9591-E3B074C2F6F6@vigilsec.com> <53CD2300.5050307@acm.org> <20140721143105.GH16966@mx1.yitter.info> <53CD291E.1020801@acm.org> <9045EC0A-E123-4CDC-B87F-5BC32C644C85@istaff.org> <53CD57E8.4000909@acm.org> <B7163126-31B6-4CC6-A711-F225051C294A@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <B7163126-31B6-4CC6-A711-F225051C294A@istaff.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/bIv13rQ4jv6FlFjB6KDMbu0EJ4o
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:08:08 -0000

Dear John,

On 21/07/2014 21:48, John Curran wrote:
> It's much simpler if you look at things one parameter space at a time: 
> who created it, what technical reservations does it have, is there a 
> general purpose portion & if so who is the delegated policy authority, 
> what entity administers the resulting policy, and what party performs 
> registry operations/publication for the entire parameter space?  The 
> general purpose DNS and IP registries are only portions are subsets 
> of the entire registry spaces; keeping that in mind may help quite a
> bit with clarity of roles.

Is there going to also be a study of accountability mechanisms for each
of the parties administering each parameter space?
Kindest regards,

Olivier