Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Tue, 02 September 2014 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33211A0023 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFG18R7U8Pa1 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E658E1A000F for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EFFCC03C; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:45:05 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lVw+qqMGHHsg; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:44:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Miles-Fidelmans-MacBook-Pro.local (5.sub-70-208-91.myvzw.com [70.208.91.5]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5F11CC046; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:44:58 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <54059FA9.50107@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:44:57 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rhill@hill-a.ch, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNOEGHCKAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
In-Reply-To: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNOEGHCKAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/53Ef5XlXJNOWQk77t871zI-YRo0
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:45:09 -0000

Ditto.

The whole point of accountability mechanisms, be they in law or contract 
form, is to address worst case situations.  When things are working, 
there's little need for such mechanisms.

Miles Fidelman

Richard Hill wrote:
> I believe in planning to prevent worst-case outcomes.
>
> But maybe my reality is different from yours.
>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ianaplan [mailto:ianaplan-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Stephen
>> Farrell
>> Sent: mardi, 2. septembre 2014 10:11
>> To: rhill@hill-a.ch; Brian E Carpenter
>> Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/09/14 08:59, Richard Hill wrote:
>>> If they are not changed, then, in my view, ICANN will have no choice
>>> but to consider that it has ultimate authority over the global
>>> Internet's systems of unique identifiers, which of course includes
>>> the protocol parameters.
>> I can't think of a universe in which is that a helpful statement.
>>
>> The "will have no choice but to consider" phrasing seems very
>> like trolling.
>>
>> And the supposed problematic outcome isn't worth bothering with
>> anyway. As has been stated numerous times, if ICANN every acted
>> silly with the protocol parameters, they'd end up out of that
>> business in 6 months and would probably suffer other collateral
>> damage as a result. So they just won't mess about is my conclusion
>> regardless of this transition. (And I don't believe there's any
>> indication they'd want to mess about with the protocol parameters
>> anyway - they do a fine job with good folks.)
>>
>> Richard - wouldn't it be better to stick to a more reality
>> based discussion?
>>
>> S.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ianaplan mailing list
>> Ianaplan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan


-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra