[Ianaplan] A draft for your review

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sat, 30 August 2014 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10111A8861 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 00:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.168
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0D6xL3ZO95e for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 00:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4493C1A885E for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 00:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8948; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1409383946; x=1410593546; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject; bh=1an7nfkxrYJ7WCXDitn6zmtgfyEcdt5OIVTmSX0QMDI=; b=eFA2mqirOcilgdmxkX50rJdTHxELS3euMgybrzpwX4vTGeUpQBd5nxM4 uNuLTTngPLXGjMUVcQBEORbMYvWj5+oZNEvNR+j6MfHpULrfsP4IbR0wl SF7fesE0GkIDiPM7QIrlefk3U/caXRAalqFKoPND3cIOhmttB0wQn1Yhj Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,430,1406592000"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="154322599"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2014 07:32:23 +0000
Received: from [] ([]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7U7WMM2014603; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 07:32:22 GMT
Message-ID: <54017E09.8060504@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:32:25 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qV8tElxK9RnDh5FElOF7vLeg3TS0p2Nft"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/u_gXE2HiETvnpVoT9MuNwYiSitc
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 07:32:28 -0000

Dear colleagues,

I have posted a -00 draft that seeks to respond to the most current
version of the RFP I could get my hands on.  Would you kindly provide
some thoughts about it?  I am most particularly concerned about
substance at the moment.  The sorts of things I'm looking for are these:

  * Is the text in the "IETF Response" accurate and in fact responsive
    to the question?
  * Is there anything missing?
  * Is there anything that does not parse well?  Did you think "Huh??"
    when you read a sentence?

My intent is to have a second version out prior to the cutoff for the
Honolulu meeting as a candidate for the IANAPLAN working group to adopt,
assuming the working group is chartered.

Kind thanks to Russ Housley and the members of the IAB IANA Strategy
Program for their very helpful contributions.  I've indicated myself and
Russ as editors, because we have not been the only ones to insert text
on this.

ps: I am aware that the formatting could stand some improvement.  I will
work on that for the next version.

--- Begin Message ---
A new version of I-D, draft-lear-iana-icg-response-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Eliot Lear and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-lear-iana-icg-response
Revision:	00
Title:		Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on IANA
Document date:	2014-08-30
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		17
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lear-iana-icg-response-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-iana-icg-response/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-iana-icg-response-00

   This document contains the a draft response to a request for
   proposals from the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group
   regarding the protocol parameters registries.  It is meant to be
   included in an aggregate proposal that also includes contributions
   covering names and addresses that will be submitted from their
   respective operational communities.  The IETF community is invited to
   comment and propose changes to this document.


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

--- End Message ---