IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Sat, 01 November 2014 05:50 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1175A1A8822 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lwTlwUfxryZW for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E6FD1A8821 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ft15so8478273pdb.11 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=hRLhXCjwe81liTe71bmNOULQLyjKna+zfsWXBZRMT6c=; b=PK3oTCNHKdGzSKd6gbqyoPEhO32jdPdisOgzzN2/SeCx1cIUVhG0LJ6GpRwAUrtSzS 19CDJ9r2qhGFz9bLqRZir+S/i76TAehHhwUiyc87F+meOLkcI9KVN1BfnTU53P7glMTC r67tSvHPEJiY2ja1M2oazZFDSrfGiJ/ozFI5k0bZPlTBkYvkIoY6s1fiaK9QchTAWjqB PYkl79955fRMVeN0KAiaqJMycxNvzPik7dWbGTtg0kKCti9gxr/VEMLiANmFk9C+xtRM sUtH9uTypQcInXmetGZleHFka3asjN6eC9BLeTSmwNdbhIo5NEMvHAX6/wIzKDWuSPKr MtkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLabNW7uF1/UpHsynvob4VQygWLqRgBMtlDk7vnK+jh+U/xy1tMtaoc+QQgIwUf7e5grhU
X-Received: by 10.67.14.129 with SMTP id fg1mr34817pad.114.1414821046140; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.11] ([73.162.11.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm11448710pbt.46.2014.10.31.22.50.44 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_624B68FE-62F9-43B6-8064-7A8F906D577A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <54547321.8010203@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:50:43 -0700
Message-Id: <DD3A14C7-BD36-4371-8448-18861CB97CCD@virtualized.org>
References: <54017E09.8060504@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140830052032.0c96c880@resistor.net> <54047E4A.30503@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140901094544.0b305698@resistor.net> <54059587.8070608@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20141024004255.0b5ef5d8@resistor.net> <4C1255B9-68C3-45D5-A618-2C7553386DF4@gmail.com> <54522E43.5020709@acm.org> <545428AC.3090802@gmail.com> <7471A339-3938-4D65-81ED-9E27A80EC32B@virtualized.org> <54546F63.1060708@cisco.com> <F0EE4BAE-0D60-4DB1-8FEA-C63E936B6150@virtualized.org> <54547321.8010203@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/82w-AarAfMt8kNOBTqHYCJSHypo
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 05:50:48 -0000

Eliot,

On Oct 31, 2014, at 10:44 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
> On 11/1/14, 6:42 AM, David Conrad wrote:
>> The same ones in which the folks most active in creating top-level
>> domains and to whom the administration of the domain space was
>> delegated were unaware?
> 
> This is not true for everyone in that community, but to be sure we can
> always do a better job at making people aware of that.

I think you might be missing my point.

IIRC, part of this thread (the part Avri was commenting on) was discussing whether there were cases in which coordination was necessary between functions.  I believe RFC 6761 is an example in which coordination was necessary and did not occur. Another is between the operational/RIR community and the IETF related to TLAs. I believe there are others. And that is with a unified IANA. The problem is that it is difficult to know beforehand whether or not coordination is necessary and/or whether the coordination has been sufficient. If IANA is to be functionally decomposed, I believe care must be taken to ensure that coordination can be done effectively.

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email