Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review

[Avri Doria <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Please pardon me for still being slow to understand the implications, or
lack thereof.

In the case of a decomposed IANA, will the IETF still have operational
change access to the name registries?

Or are we arguing that RIRs and [cc,g]NSO+ only have access to their own
registries, but that the IETF maintains operational change access to all
3?  If so would there  need to be additional MOUs &c. with IANA.names
and IANA.numbers?

avri

On 02-Nov-14 00:51, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> My suggested edit:
>
> * I favor preserving the reference to participation in the IETF by ICANN and RIR staff and community participants; it strengthens the point that they are part of the coordination we're discussing in this section.
>
> * I suggest new text for the first bullet point:
> 	"The IETF has specified a number of special use registries with regard to domain names.  These registries require coordination with ICANN as the policy authority for the DNS root [RFC2860], including community groups that are responsible for ICANN policy on domain names such as the GNSO and the ccNSO.  There are already mechanisms in place to perform this coordination, and the capacity to modify them to meet new conditions as they might arise." [RFC6761, http://www.ietf.org/liaison/managers.html]