IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Sat, 01 November 2014 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE931A1B04 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 14:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDEzDtiZFF9r for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 14:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17EE01A1B01 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 14:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [50.189.173.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A33528A035 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 21:50:04 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 17:50:03 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20141101215002.GD25666@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140901094544.0b305698@resistor.net> <54059587.8070608@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20141024004255.0b5ef5d8@resistor.net> <4C1255B9-68C3-45D5-A618-2C7553386DF4@gmail.com> <54522E43.5020709@acm.org> <545428AC.3090802@gmail.com> <7471A339-3938-4D65-81ED-9E27A80EC32B@virtualized.org> <20141101165234.GA25533@mx1.yitter.info> <660C2734-F8AF-44FB-95B4-D04AF1DF1361@virtualized.org> <54553797.1070605@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54553797.1070605@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/LSCiSN-FQhUAms_GZbBnoCKUrso
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 21:50:07 -0000

On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 08:42:15AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> operators sides of the house. And if he feels that, then it's true
> by definition: we didn't consult enough, period.

Perhaps.  It could also be that, at the time that RFC 6761 was working
its way through the IETF alimentary tract, some participants in the
IETF tried pretty hard to get people in the ICANN world interested in
it, but discovered that they were all completely consumed with the new
gTLD program.  I'm not sure, however, how much value we'll get in
debating the facts of the past.

> proposed text. If the IETF (or IESG or IAB) gets too wrapped up in
> itself, we will screw up.

Certainly true.  But it is surely equally true that, if we allow
technical needs that we might have to be driven by other groups'
priorities, we'll have to stop work.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email