Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sat, 01 November 2014 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3A41A884F for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C0lUbPmy8hpp for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EAEA1A884D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2003; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414827789; x=1416037389; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=JGetZOS6mgfOoZW1Q/t3LAVynIoArkgqb05C2Cwc4MI=; b=av1IH0FaDKaYDRU9UjGvQiWce9vhxXYWh5diKbc1YxcfT0Rol2fYfDyn WHXP6SKgZtA3zfiwJheaKVVBH322VZB0RXgIyalZIGpdlZ8nbSzjiBj6F jAx3N/cuPpzJNb6/TC9FiKBB7o5Ag3mB8wHy+P4N/mc633HAC3KkB6pWd Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AroEAJeOVFStJssW/2dsb2JhbABchDqDBtIAAoErAQEBAQF9hAIBAQEDASNVAQULCw4KCRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBg0BBQIBARCIJAm1EJRQAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARmREAeCd4FUAQSULYFSh36BMYZDilCECYN5PC+CSwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,295,1413244800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="233336817"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2014 07:42:58 +0000
Received: from [10.61.174.26] ([10.61.174.26]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA17gw98004021; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 07:42:58 GMT
Message-ID: <54548F03.1080303@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 08:42:59 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
References: <54017E09.8060504@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140830052032.0c96c880@resistor.net> <54047E4A.30503@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140901094544.0b305698@resistor.net> <54059587.8070608@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20141024004255.0b5ef5d8@resistor.net> <4C1255B9-68C3-45D5-A618-2C7553386DF4@gmail.com> <54522E43.5020709@acm.org> <545428AC.3090802@gmail.com> <7471A339-3938-4D65-81ED-9E27A80EC32B@virtualized.org> <54546F63.1060708@cisco.com> <F0EE4BAE-0D60-4DB1-8FEA-C63E936B6150@virtualized.org> <54547321.8010203@cisco.com> <DD3A14C7-BD36-4371-8448-18861CB97CCD@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <DD3A14C7-BD36-4371-8448-18861CB97CCD@virtualized.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dcAt02wwVFce9VCUMq5QNKnWkt33lJ96F"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/7w_lss5XIgWHKwZs58JojOr62ZQ
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 07:43:11 -0000

On 11/1/14, 6:50 AM, David Conrad wrote:
> Eliot,
>
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 10:44 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>> On 11/1/14, 6:42 AM, David Conrad wrote:
>>> The same ones in which the folks most active in creating top-level
>>> domains and to whom the administration of the domain space was
>>> delegated were unaware?
>> This is not true for everyone in that community, but to be sure we can
>> always do a better job at making people aware of that.
> I think you might be missing my point.
>
> IIRC, part of this thread (the part Avri was commenting on) was discussing whether there were cases in which coordination was necessary between functions.  I believe RFC 6761 is an example in which coordination was necessary and did not occur.

What I am saying is that the entries there were discussed between
participants in both organizations.


>  Another is between the operational/RIR community and the IETF related to TLAs.

Of this I have no knowledge.  Again, certainly we can all do a better job.

Eliot