Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sat, 01 November 2014 05:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0021A87F0 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X0arl7MAK4mt for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA2B1A87EF for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1282; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414820648; x=1416030248; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=BVIqHWzy19Tu3zuwbOvFChtpwUB3ympp+ToPVQY9KZM=; b=O46EBAaicAhcqbOurH7MOUzxq2Nf8w64YPuodZ378a9Wh9uEg3zq3hGS pwgE0a5E2mfuLlGrwmFPlrIaELOly6bKfikVjY0fKnck+b3c45wAISp6r 82+GwzpU2/ZOCyPHEGum5Sos+nGnAT220uQj2RM0s6vON7RJaVqV5ylB+ Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq8EADhyVFStJssW/2dsb2JhbABch0DSAAKBKwEBAQEBfYQDAQEEI1UBEAsOCgkWCwICCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcBARCILbUclFUBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGZEQB4J3gVQBBJQtgVKHfoExhkOKUIQJg3k8gnoBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,295,1413244800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="228552629"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2014 05:44:06 +0000
Received: from [10.61.174.26] ([10.61.174.26]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA15i140005658; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 05:44:05 GMT
Message-ID: <54547321.8010203@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 06:44:01 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
References: <54017E09.8060504@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140830052032.0c96c880@resistor.net> <54047E4A.30503@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140901094544.0b305698@resistor.net> <54059587.8070608@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20141024004255.0b5ef5d8@resistor.net> <4C1255B9-68C3-45D5-A618-2C7553386DF4@gmail.com> <54522E43.5020709@acm.org> <545428AC.3090802@gmail.com> <7471A339-3938-4D65-81ED-9E27A80EC32B@virtualized.org> <54546F63.1060708@cisco.com> <F0EE4BAE-0D60-4DB1-8FEA-C63E936B6150@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <F0EE4BAE-0D60-4DB1-8FEA-C63E936B6150@virtualized.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UOvvctwiQQ6T5E1K06ixO8vdJdSHL3c15"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/r-C5SC7D0LFMNSlg-i5HBD0a5-U
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 05:44:09 -0000

On 11/1/14, 6:42 AM, David Conrad wrote:
> The same ones in which the folks most active in creating top-level
> domains and to whom the administration of the domain space was
> delegated were unaware?

This is not true for everyone in that community, but to be sure we can
always do a better job at making people aware of that.

Eliot