IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review

"Richard Hill" <rhill@hill-a.ch> Sat, 25 October 2014 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rhill@hill-a.ch>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D16E1A8737 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z56mjLhKdAvm for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.infomaniak.ch (smtp3.infomaniak.ch [IPv6:2001:1600:2:5:92b1:1cff:fe01:147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BDAB1A8766 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Laurie (adsl-84-227-234-164.adslplus.ch [84.227.234.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp3.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9PAFVvG004260; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:15:31 +0200
From: Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:18:21 +0200
Message-ID: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNIEBBCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <544B4918.2040201@cisco.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/zz4on3myM22jtQonuHZnYgI3geE
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rhill@hill-a.ch
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 10:16:10 -0000

I support deleting "including staff or other participants from ICANN or the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs), and people affiliated with those organizations regularly do."

Saying "anyone who wishes to participate" is sufficient, in my view.

Best,
Richard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ianaplan [mailto:ianaplan-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Eliot Lear
> Sent: samedi, 25. octobre 2014 08:54
> To: "Martin J. Dürst"; S Moonesamy; Suzanne Woolf
> Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/25/14, 2:29 AM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> >> At 05:50 24-10-2014, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> >
> >>> Eliot's language could stand some tinkering, but I can live with it.
> >>> Since I owe him text on another point, I'll suggest while I'm here the
> >>> following revision:
> >>>
> >>> "It is important to note that the IETF includes anyone who wishes to
> >>> participate, including staff or other participants from ICANN or the
> >>> Regional Internet Registries (RIRs), and people affiliated with those
> >>> organizations regularly do."
> >
> > The switch of direction between the first clause (IETF includes) and
> > the last one (people do) is still there, and causing confusion. Please
> > fix, thanks!
> >
> 
> I propose simply dropping the last phrase.  I don't know how to really
> address the grammar in such a way that the point doesn't sound overstated.
> 
> Eliot
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email