IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Sat, 01 November 2014 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA6C1A0099 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 10:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQZp7sh1sfRL for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 10:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39FB81A0020 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 10:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kx10so9662444pab.20 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=g5VIRhaOR3fefMBsLzz9LqdoVY7gC7CNMv0oKZFXU2g=; b=maEARy9oJBakkqyjzPkfcbIRImUsC4WXG2sFE6E+w6uB1gYbjH1qDwNn0mE7lIYyO1 8F2R/Tuaie2EPZtyTJ2g4C9w4/KwLPA+YHqanN/KtkBNxe5Jn9K/T/RCGOlj14SOAkfh DCmmxAqO6toZtmuoo5qbnrT/2BVii4hqd1j6EYKsKrYak0o1Xm/63YtDYg5qLyzB+At+ jD+T3RXd6N39zkb15Z+203Myfm8xyKjXncN78tRSAFDV7fqr4A85RqYE/Yc64FTx7Mcp qOluj/580N7wmN+omhdXdnPHetEE1I4YOC1oUVuZSBMjcNjilb8Wp9iBUJuAHA6OyEkk ebyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlXh2RKnmIjYTp087+gxmFTayWdghT8n04MC4WU/tULQGdyqx5iMSFjoPpKmaqlnjSJQQD9
X-Received: by 10.68.250.131 with SMTP id zc3mr32071146pbc.34.1414864434540; Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.11] ([73.162.11.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l6sm13042413pdr.39.2014.11.01.10.53.53 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_38F44E6B-9207-4B61-A342-0E8E1B71D41B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141101165234.GA25533@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:53:51 -0700
Message-Id: <660C2734-F8AF-44FB-95B4-D04AF1DF1361@virtualized.org>
References: <54017E09.8060504@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140830052032.0c96c880@resistor.net> <54047E4A.30503@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140901094544.0b305698@resistor.net> <54059587.8070608@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20141024004255.0b5ef5d8@resistor.net> <4C1255B9-68C3-45D5-A618-2C7553386DF4@gmail.com> <54522E43.5020709@acm.org> <545428AC.3090802@gmail.com> <7471A339-3938-4D65-81ED-9E27A80EC32B@virtualized.org> <20141101165234.GA25533@mx1.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/VEMYEej1_w4NSbRSed4ct6MV99k
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] A draft for your review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 17:53:57 -0000

Andrew,

On Nov 1, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> Additions to the registry require either Standards Action or IESG
> Approval, which is a high bar.  

Given the IETF has delegated administration via RFC 2860, I would have thought it useful to formally include the delegatee in discussions related to the resource (either domain names or IP addresses) being discussed, not just have the decision be solely dependent on the IESG's opinion. 

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email