Re: Concerns about Singapore

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Thu, 07 April 2016 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043A012D17D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 366_TPzpWIt3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 994D112D157 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id o6so35490247qkc.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8HvVc2sTVgv8mtXimUmzGK20HxKUHwIo7cJIH5J/HBw=; b=b9d1AMm34d8sc+QuiOqkHPc8devcocgWn/TuUVw/hMBLYfzUdVVpGo9+i5kOG933I8 iq70/XpbWtB31lY/3A1NLD3XqtHQu93fLJa7vPZZyqiTij2Lul6TmJPB3cpQHda4dqbu 1NIArKp60MOQDvUmuNW8nXCRuDFNOOmMJzAtePqGyPvTd/1nsESfNvUXNGapxvRGf0Vj r+hpOKSswbamyT3mSiuJ+P+b7hoIiFgJBbj/mzlPc4yXkYZjmIHwMcjCjgVObxTs1h5E tskcfLbpj2RJinC+OsebrVMYbO4nCj0vLkcivbNPZJd8apIg4eISwF07YILEt4eQ8QZY Tr8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8HvVc2sTVgv8mtXimUmzGK20HxKUHwIo7cJIH5J/HBw=; b=COY1pJ+N5ATCC1y9j4TsPwd/yeVBDAWug5W3ljIOr3F9Y7hC2/xp3HhQsw1RPHZR5X RQcdpn1QkWxJt/3lvgNiKdd5PB5zr17xCdf5ypB9HDQnujg+vr+F3eddZiz2dnzLfkOB +xsbnVbVLY6xP8TRdvfH1Qe/iq6a/TPpxEvEN5TUITtcuZWp1r+/MkLP9PBdZPUKFUKa yn7Fy0Mt99j2c1Kuo/yrdj8AFg/nFGryLZm9DwSpqBzCJSkW4lcuvISMn0PPk8t1ujLB edyXczSxAahBWqRf/lsMNbLOg0oijY1m4NPD1HlAH64DEnE0aj3X2ycJBPQNg3sTtXFE aLJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJW3H9whzTllkOw38uCCTHaEYOAsE8AbNC8bYzFIev0Y6BFfCpEyG7yg8C36XKEmw==
X-Received: by 10.55.197.70 with SMTP id p67mr6315013qki.66.1460058692708; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:152:4059:bb38:ef12:29ac? ([2001:67c:370:152:4059:bb38:ef12:29ac]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 64sm4027931qgy.34.2016.04.07.12.51.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se> <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Message-ID: <5706BA40.3060005@mnt.se>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:51:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/90_hx0KlIDtl-8H44ZBmSC_4muA>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 19:51:35 -0000

> ​No, I meant that IETF would be doing a disservice to a large part of
> the world (that has on its books these laws). We need to have a nuanced
> approach and this being another factor in a multitude of factors. Having
> a blanket rule that the IETF will not go to any such place is something
> I disagree with.   
>  
> 

Where do you draw the line then?