Re: Concerns about Singapore

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6711112D10C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AJ_a9TBThFcG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C034C12D55A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id kb1so22461043igb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=+KQeCyZ3oXszJ7BaFvo57pGwILSavxAxwoepxq5COKo=; b=sXkmKYcBS4+dedWXKdp7lCHCi9piZhVowptRB9VmYl93MLxXP6LCTzxkAyoyV6AvQJ ToOzK3wJ3FC9ULGIp3Ymcx9HWOJg4tUVcxole9V3EX6iVE1/O65G7r/E8fFFvpe9z6/T tnPf83iX57bLLfzQ1mxMKxJmrCkiSbJEZTnuSn4ihCrtwMKMZwio6tixrXeFW2z+co8j VpfHqGePEebQgWeSG7NBgZlMLs9ECJ1GU1dbd4X8798qYLrpfmgntsEl3i+m77AQ+Av8 mxKKDbHSXmUwEO5jjx1mC8Q0sZFFLvvaNJycULfWJsv+4RA/PStkSh/k8I6tqg62S720 qeNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=+KQeCyZ3oXszJ7BaFvo57pGwILSavxAxwoepxq5COKo=; b=GoNCnLD7MHDmrsuDxtD1+FWmCiMfIL/mS9SEoXly7uQXOZgqJIjPrihmGLdrMLhhMd T7cB3UmLIjDIi0X1TQ+YapOfdGU7qFrO39PDoyk/pQ1lJyI7VAl6i/ZuZC5bBjpSR0+s lAubjgT2TNHI2c7zHBr7gKZIQ9UzdS3RVXLzUHAREOOy84dbQfzbp76OyDNt+B1Yc6rL sO8//6bOHN4BsWrT1wmHy7D+ZmZBm+U3KFtpgkvKFf0j6ChmIOvDaNDpij4TsAThB/TP g4FEzNc3JsLgu7FTzNjTMQ55Eoj2WEsVJgKuYSkSD4KQprTE76SxsoLoRLlgUOfsTX4q UeWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIHS6UN+yOLzm2qalyuH1iJoZCd2y48yua6+5yE8Zq1IV1yZpVnyE8AL1LrykUX5hov4tprU5XsqJbWnA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.137.66 with SMTP id qg2mr28947495igb.25.1460061901095; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.205.7 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.205.7 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKRbAfB=n5kNGKoQLZE1Dq1TVpZ+39c+ddW7HLnTQY_QZQ7zbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se> <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com> <9B723FB0-6B93-4C85-ADD9-D423F873CF08@virtualized.org> <CAKRbAfB=n5kNGKoQLZE1Dq1TVpZ+39c+ddW7HLnTQY_QZQ7zbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:45:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKRbAfDJxtgMiyQKWt9ppcJVFexkhgVEnCApdy_9GDOWtLOMGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3c2ccf72df7052feb26f3
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ATWGQbBmElXUNb3wh6t2mzgBGA0>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 20:45:09 -0000

I've been thinking quite a bit about that line, and I think that in a lot
of those marginal cases it comes down to questions about public
accommodation and the ability to move freely.  It seems to me that when
there's a legitimate question about whether or not our participants will be
able to check into a meeting hotel with his or her family, were have a
problem that goes beyond individual conscience.

Melinda