Re: Concerns about Singapore

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 08 April 2016 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C6512D129 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1HriJEFWnc9S for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9953912D0A8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2033; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1460150292; x=1461359892; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=4F5XSHX8uaVM/EMPL+9fCtvZkFwFKVC7tmUwSGp5Suk=; b=DoNh6s1+TcYKL2iiY3q7C4NbTPUnYpdwbmPBxTpRy2qP3R+XY+Jo88ud NvhEqDZKJYavNVTNPQMbOxeM/XpztXHCOKRs1Ahp1o9Gy1jdbnqW+FOzY 7UYEO6af9vj28Cv44q3FpsxIGhHriMlZf1S+JFLYxFpYO3EAy6mCyAVj5 w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AtBQAoHwhX/5RdJa1cgzdTfQauZ41ZI?= =?us-ascii?q?4VqAoEzPBABAQEBAQEBZSeEQgEBBCNGAQ8QAgEIGCoCAiERJQIEDgUOiAQDEg6?= =?us-ascii?q?ud4w9DYUhAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDQiIFgiCToJBhH4rgisFl1MxA?= =?us-ascii?q?YMjgWZthiCBdYFRZIxYh0qHWgE3K4NnbAGIOn4BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,454,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="91749001"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2016 21:18:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (xch-aln-015.cisco.com [173.36.7.25]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u38LIBDX003123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:18:11 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:18:10 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:18:10 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
Thread-Topic: Concerns about Singapore
Thread-Index: AQHRkOMYE5f4WLltSk+KMEq8Vk+KKZ9/KOsAgAAATwCAAAuKAIAACE2AgAD6eICAAAIPgIAAHFeAgACUOgA=
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:18:10 +0000
Message-ID: <2CF731C8-41F0-419F-8695-FE391FB79CD1@cisco.com>
References: <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com> <1481689286.47880.1460111891664.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <6E18B072-412B-474D-963F-7EF20E31979E@gmail.com> <3352E874-D874-4676-B8CA-1C9E099F72F3@nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3352E874-D874-4676-B8CA-1C9E099F72F3@nohats.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.82.70]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BA2349E7-9296-4FF0-BCB2-B99DB59AA1AB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mc8KeidXlGUcDNQhfGx5_rBsphs>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 21:18:14 -0000

On Apr 8, 2016, at 9:26 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2016, at 07:45, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8 Apr 2016, at 7:38 AM, <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> wrote:
>>> On a positive note:
>>> 
>>> Pope Francis urges greater acceptance of homosexuals, non-traditional families
>>> http://edition.cnn.com/2016/04/08/europe/vatican-pope-family/index.html?adkey=bn
>> 
>> That’s fine, but I don’t think the Vatican has a good venue for us. :-)
> 
> But we could adopt the Conclave model of decision making!
> 
> Paul

We already have running code on that. It's called "the Nomcom".