Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Tue, 12 April 2016 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF19F12D803 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6cXnSD6dkbNh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6102912D76A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:401:4:3000:1d88:ad36:3fc4:763] (unknown [IPv6:2601:401:4:3000:1d88:ad36:3fc4:763]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18F365406A7; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:44:04 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <860206232.1954211.1460419714948.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:44:03 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F2FE2CAF-A8E5-4956-8A9F-2BBD704154A8@puck.nether.net>
References: <20160411223403.GA6743@gsp.org> <860206232.1954211.1460419714948.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
To: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/fttHYDNM5z1tcv-Jd9Z-J1CpXS4>
Cc: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:44:07 -0000

> On Apr 11, 2016, at 8:08 PM, <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> try listening to the first twenty minutes of this.
> then tell me if IETF WG meetings with remote presentation
> via Meetecho are anything other than a complete waste
> of time.
> 

The NTPWG had a very successful experience, including remote presenters, and remote people going back and forth with their interaction.  

I would say your experience is atypical, and certainly not the desired outcome.

- Jared