Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 12 April 2016 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF9312EA9C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=5yMd9n3J; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=aDzYxnJE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQswYKP4xj4H for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9C4612EAB2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 47337 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2016 20:17:03 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=b8e8.570d57bf.k1604; bh=WvWcDJ+3AHnCxkJ1fYS49Q19Zy9wgfK2SZU6Leg4TIA=; b=5yMd9n3JKMtDM7WvPeMr/njVAIWBzfX0OA16YQtiALtCLp6i7I4CYsW1R1Xuq626BOYGpZZwJ6EsFBkRZqO0HoS30z+2dELOObbxMjwaQIirmX0HdUcLO2gaZAc9r8BTQonupPAEvO5IiBklA2wF5UkcPLl7p4LHdfWFslvI0AN6WQRcrBxpZdrVxM0xffTFJrQ5ap7AlEJ86dxdo8wByV1OZCn5JO8Sl9aodyvyGq4OIGVMGm3kJpEJcSMca3ZI
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=b8e8.570d57bf.k1604; bh=WvWcDJ+3AHnCxkJ1fYS49Q19Zy9wgfK2SZU6Leg4TIA=; b=aDzYxnJEOIHP3eeNGmNyKGu+O8415nV0AX5Tr3GrgYGvc4l7yKhwNKbp+21hmvCUwIkFKc09JyOwOkaIg+WGydxvoOoLjF9ltvYibDPVCpAwCsgHY2LHBdmFb5w9+ZXCdH2YVqApqamEabE8690aBDmBsWQYT3IGuVCp8rQVu53YSrNpIOFS4XcvBTgPLI+e+ZhI93XHm9Mb70QKd0WNtL5cukdSVjdO5Pap7ZBAwjs+xdOun1OOMoz4WN5lCmLe
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 12 Apr 2016 20:17:02 -0000
Date: 12 Apr 2016 16:17:02 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1604121614250.2223@ary.lan>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Ted Lemon" <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1nLWrVqGpPh+h=Ano6PJyw2ZRaroiAMgG4RDKTFV7rkpA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1604100736080.45987@rabdullah.local> <20160410181958.58762.qmail@ary.lan> <CAMm+LwgE_oOJSCjgsMGTSMDV2-LsUzw1zW3-+N_VCtE14m26BA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nLWrVqGpPh+h=Ano6PJyw2ZRaroiAMgG4RDKTFV7rkpA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VBjAwH33fbqgmIpXqxbZPKaCDZI>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:17:07 -0000

> The UK filter is an "opt out" filter, and I assume that we (the IETF) opted
> out. ...

This isn't the parental filter, this is the child porn filter, which I am 
fairly sure is mandatory, at last on consumer ISPs.

A few years ago they listed a Wikipedia page which had an image of an old 
rock record cover with a small nude girl behind a cracked pain of glass. 
They eventually backed down when people pointed out why that particular 
entry was silly, e.g., the record had been available in used record stores 
for decades.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.