Re: Concerns about Singapore

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5875412D718 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4VSTc9Sv8pCg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D055112D72A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1aoIUf-0008AT-QT; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 18:33:41 -0400
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 18:33:36 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Laurent Ciavaglia <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>, EXT Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
Message-ID: <A1D17F91B9C8D60D91222AAC@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <5706CEEA.70402@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se> <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com> <5706BA40.3060005@mnt.se> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604072157240.31096@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5706CEEA.70402@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/M7BKqII48F9vPgnnRhaVJ5kn22A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 22:33:48 -0000


--On Thursday, April 07, 2016 23:19 +0200 Laurent Ciavaglia
<laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com> wrote:

> On 07/04/2016 22:00, EXT Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> There are no perfect places to go.
> Except Minneapolis. ;)

If it were, the frequency with which we have been back there in
recent years might act as confirmation of the maxim that the
perfect is the enemy of the good.   I assume there are other
reasons, perhaps even better ones.

   john