Re: Concerns about Singapore

<> Fri, 08 April 2016 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA8A12D5CA for <>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2j_0txdbTUEQ for <>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B9A112D5A4 for <>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=s2048; t=1460111892; bh=eiKso1Yha5CMnwyVhtRYpZIdxsYWovwssmrsfFkMp1I=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=KBIca1Fi0WuWGsvokRo8/t1bUpLqIXRbXMF+FNIMWP6p4ER6oQb4itsGl8IIpmM+c/os1dE51yCwz8MRhmfIY0n4H9jF2OwRZyouSVPQa1hJhNisJORMuDuSWKQxcGOiCOz/ri7wfQbI3xGnq+NtRwQ2dXodF51kqVK524NF6jaw4Fyg2ZpmEnpyYSvmtJlBU5bBES1z4/702spdz2FkKoEMIMImGvq2AMGRBoJH7/HOjDP8fVgkl688ThbWdk64e1nfjrWFaqXZF6vKRu/JJATKlN1gXvXIUxDbk7T6Oax3d+vSWkc0m+qHvgii8Ew8vhbKcVzLMcLQ/3ZNtKmMaA==
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2016 10:38:12 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2016 10:38:12 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2016 10:38:12 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: shZKSf8VM1nDezpSyb0HR3AaU0rfRV_6_Ky71tykBUz8Kz4Gcfa1Hxw7Yq.XLpb Lgt_VuyV2D753tVZSrrqSIZBxPmbhXExJ2SdmXYtEiWGU3h0PNSr9aVJ28QynTaT7E2thVGu3CxD bq4pB27yJQVbaBKVVOyagHojl_fQqdzupCrcMb3F_RD9O5n3OApKwDo_fesvW5wttyxvD6J0fKBv lUhUZwr3flpqLsRjjLsxX1OhFM3exqnKZ4x640JRlg6nVuVz0T9wBAmIO8cEvFdan39DI_NO1nQV rY4cZKxwVgnj6IXN0o3Wssk3wZ5Zb.8igpsxIkDb1nxhTVE44CPBgMSEpXFx1jq0RMaJCHqNIpxQ syuVVaqZ.K09lNjS4amMLB3Q5R11.T1Ba.xS7IPh3M5c_uMnICDewRERtrt2CL2k7ewUOFm7R2S9 wKozF6cldTtJX4rJPWj2VVXoi1W1yPpr8yo9MaUIjG24i5.U3QcpH.BoE5ueHVW.07yS0_LC4ZSE ZTXm6ENp7FcZPpLq65w4wErir6s8W9oSTw8ulpWWKVEzMPFGNewQ1M0EmVpEW9TZVLAjzxUhMzn1 MHP78p7f7YBbm48L6pX.E7V18mIHsZF1BTm8ta9g-
Received: by; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:38:11 +0000
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:38:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: <>
To: Dhruv Dhody <>, Leif Johansson <>
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Cc: " Discussion" <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:38:15 -0000

On a positive note:

Pope Francis urges greater acceptance of homosexuals, non-traditional families

Nalini Elkins
Inside Products, Inc.
(831) 659-8360

From: Dhruv Dhody <>
To: Leif Johansson <> 
Cc: " Discussion" <>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore

Hi Leif, 

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Leif Johansson <> wrote:

On 2016-04-07 20:30, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>> +1
>> I am happy to see that LGBT inclusiveness taken seriously by the IETF.
>> But looking at the law on the books in black and white, would be doing a
>> disservice to a large region of the world (with a large number of
>> Internet users).
>I don't parse that actually.

​Sorry if I was not clear. 

>How is reading the law of Singapore "doing disservice to a large region
>of the world?"

​No, I meant that IETF would be doing a disservice to a large part of the world (that has on its books these laws). We need to have a nuanced approach and this being another factor in a multitude of factors. Having a blanket rule that the IETF will not go to any such place is something I disagree with.   

>I don't think "yes but many who live in Singapore are nice people"
>nor "yes but those laws are hardly ever applied" are useful arguments
>in this discussion but maybe thats just me...
>I am pretty sure that Ted (to pick a random example) would be able to
>travel to Singapore for an IETF and be /personally/ quite safe because
>as you say the laws of the land would be selectively applied.
>That is always the problem of selectively applied laws: they are used
>when it is convenient... and are often used to intimidate. That is why
>censorship is often self-administered in countries where there are
>censorship laws "on the books".

​I agree with you. I understand this well, as an openly gay person, living in a country with such laws​ on the book. 
I hope these laws go away but till then, having a blanket rule against taking IETF to a big part of the world is something I find wrong. 


>        Cheers Leif