IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concerns about Singapore

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 13 April 2016 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C403812E2EE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uYLlQJ_svVKb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D46012E2E6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id c126so73148616lfb.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IH0UDFmFjsS7ZMtY01p9y32+mhCTIG2J8RZPbjiZ7ss=; b=QJfEzMqPDCjWcfxDqcSNwyEIMaircQj8sG7FptR96QzN1KqzxeuHeWHmbTk+q04dUe UmxAZ7zMSi2XLMu28E/9txK4M2TvaDGSnKPndhAb0bBlGC87WG+ETtjIHGlXE0NWSLce Mty4nla1ZYeNJLotdDU33zJHIhz6ZJ+BO0v91HVvczR8uwQnQEC15hodZCefpZDVJ79J aQqerZ+qm+jMogyqaA9C9X3u8uGXR3hewiIbXM6dVdtwdkmcf8SNfjbR6gO1cEL48zxm /Pbp9EcnS7ImcQIdIMmfSS5F2hK1ITXTA8OpMgS+YtP8wEvsvEvj8ls2kE/rhqVq2ZKM oqNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IH0UDFmFjsS7ZMtY01p9y32+mhCTIG2J8RZPbjiZ7ss=; b=cMmW2GlUfAPqNIeyvHwzz3Aa+R4g7+o36pI9T5eQha0IuFT8cRCu7mQfrUOMQ/9x29 VeX40pNO0YLhhj2kg5UevwPgyg2TgOfzhotiQTuflk22+LS1SERXQmtTQPZVo2pjRXpr zIL3iyX2vqlZa/pDBDy1Dc0mhPgvJ01JiYXNS7O6JGqOrJxb1LrLiBKJ+0p6eLAn1P5o VA0A8DZLDOX/o/QTgos1j/M6WIfLKR1N+gMwp1SpWNQ6xl/pw2eoZ/gjT4ek9vfV3RKW BayhfULvSJi0lRJImAJ8T26R+qvgps9zE3vsT0N6ruPEm2B+adDTGYC4ZXuZc2/em6dc AL9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUu9uNFUic3eIQtQtxFp/wWIMaDhfe0I4GYclSjdZ//GcidlgQsSDcHdll8+XVTlT/233m18e+taHP+lw==
X-Received: by 10.25.205.146 with SMTP id d140mr4498228lfg.109.1460558841377; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.40.136 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
In-Reply-To: <20160413130948.GC9940@pfrc.org>
References: <20160411104519.GA19092@gsp.org> <3F48466D-390C-4C18-B958-732AE3E46FF1@gmail.com> <20160411223403.GA6743@gsp.org> <CAPt1N1nNo0=JSptQdWRZCFy1v-m6Q8NQy4WVGHtnRJuFZFmMig@mail.gmail.com> <CAKr6gn1KmNcgNwbPHZWB2aJQAuchz4eB7gxJhV2Dsbc1Z50kDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1mWjg_-525avYJ4PnSECYQrtpVFJCXPfH=PryJ8q0vy4Q@mail.gmail.com> <A684A3C4-7161-49F5-919E-A5F948A3F316@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|d5cb2cb80712b3716e1ab4e2a54c9430s3BCG403tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|A684A3C4-7161-49F5-919E-A5F948A3F316@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <570CF594.5070509@pi.nu> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1604120745250.52880@rabdullah.local> <20160413130948.GC9940@pfrc.org>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:46:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nRNYdqJzPdNrzHRW8sUGOm4ngnJCqd2i9H7wD5QV+-zg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114128caea167d05305eda9a"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GGm2Xqu7la72JixqN7Cc_95IB60>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:47:28 -0000

Hm.  Beware of the Leopard.   However, it did work for me when I tried it
yesterday.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:47:25AM -0700, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> > "I don't think anything that is within our power to do can change this
> > perception."
> >
> > Perhaps some information from "the ground" and from frequent visitors
> > to Singapore who would have concerns about these issue *might* help.
> >
> > Let's gather the data before we throw the baby out with the bath water
> > so to speak.
>
> My point much earlier on. :-)
>
> -- Jeff
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email