Re: Concerns about Singapore

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF26612D5E8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HCAT7ST86eT1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB8612D55D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f1so161423077igr.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=iAzxA51Jl5n+s5bGkm3VVBBIAWPWSxoF0Pk7bG8iTys=; b=Bs17835DY4+Hon/QayYNH2/+FUrKoeHlYi/13Udq8NAz4vmEgUqcCTXTAeTqSpktSU 3HWqWHBJSfbthKI4oCyCPz1yR9NoeUa71hfLQofBXIz+z79q0wvD7kV5r7/znEZZKubi Gma96S9IWeQgBMUxRUSDcNVeHZL67WXOnsQKOiwphbQnmcxecUxMelU65plwlM/4oA0u AUIfgCHFn7G5vApKsrXt7PZub7GsY00qjmH/VCNOpBk5qmFEjyb5nGtLYBTT24pQNcdI NmNSLeM6Fln6pI8IxzGsKICXYPZlYDRLx6V6VU6CzrP3DZQ6FqNIs4M8A3m19ZvJeBk1 gsJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=iAzxA51Jl5n+s5bGkm3VVBBIAWPWSxoF0Pk7bG8iTys=; b=WP9W75VYnis+ComjN52Kk+fjxpD+covog98zHhJEjn/4tdgYYB+TSth+aqn72W3zfk qP2VVDlKUsFsU6DVz9q9Tg+7j3HSnn1n/A1eQXcTJNE6KB+ITDBJj/lILUsQIucY1WTQ RjL+chsaBAojJgoY4ijZLgvUJPNUiYOgfkR088bvB5RDPsGTOZ8EfNQ481SbB/ycoLzi T1dWYb9uufxzWrwtQoqMCbRQKbDDMk3OEWIyMOSTHxrpqFUsKGmnthx259Lrj8+aXKYC awa2AwGyUyYrxY+prKG+bgEX9VlGGE+z9/cWAN6YzRjA9VpKHTM3yliW+VRvfbzKxKrk TFbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIrJUgJ20wlPpUWLT0XE5CgX5H7bj2OI2+16J4zSoNqXTClI/GV3bpKqPmjmvB0V37QmeGsih/wBR2MLA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.79.167 with SMTP id k7mr28643164igx.27.1460058104042; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.222.71 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se>
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:41:43 -0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SlEaK4zPneXH-CCAciTIYrLG9_M
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a1a38a49f6e052fea44cc
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KDR8xpX3FqFA1c_g6HPpvTpzDBU>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 19:41:52 -0000

Hi Leif,

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:

> On 2016-04-07 20:30, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > I am happy to see that LGBT inclusiveness taken seriously by the IETF.
> > But looking at the law on the books in black and white, would be doing a
> > disservice to a large region of the world (with a large number of
> > Internet users).
>
> I don't parse that actually.
>

​Sorry if I was not clear.
​

>
> How is reading the law of Singapore "doing disservice to a large region
> of the world?"
>

​No, I meant that IETF would be doing a disservice to a large part of the
world (that has on its books these laws). We need to have a nuanced
approach and this being another factor in a multitude of factors. Having a
blanket rule that the IETF will not go to any such place is something
I disagree with.


>
> I don't think "yes but many who live in Singapore are nice people"
> nor "yes but those laws are hardly ever applied" are useful arguments
> in this discussion but maybe thats just me...
>
> I am pretty sure that Ted (to pick a random example) would be able to
> travel to Singapore for an IETF and be /personally/ quite safe because
> as you say the laws of the land would be selectively applied.
>
> That is always the problem of selectively applied laws: they are used
> when it is convenient... and are often used to intimidate. That is why
> censorship is often self-administered in countries where there are
> censorship laws "on the books".
>

​I agree with you. I understand this well, as an openly gay person, living
in a country with such laws​ on the book.
I hope these laws go away but till then, having a blanket rule against
taking IETF to a big part of the world is something I find wrong.

Thanks!
Dhruv


>         Cheers Leif
>
>