Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Tue, 12 April 2016 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA6C12D11C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6K8Tfkwovl_8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82E3F12D7A0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g184so32773588lfb.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=WkhSNMNX5AghpZ1EplPI2sMAgcklx5hBILV9dsWLvyk=; b=K52DfCIo8ApL4vuES4Dj3KeHOAPBQqm3oOk+RFSPt8Jxcoee3binH5016BWNd7pxuK eJzy4WR6ZLY8hMeDnfPIxIf4SUl3HptX5zymBGdM3tkleAyHX6mLeuM8yNqyg+vyDhut kCOAovYZ6CMVUZA7mde/Nr9+9nVJ4wUkPxrACINtaph7B9m6Ugxq0j7famb1NVizEtMY Sb3mP+VnMb33zsjXbUHIK0Gu6bckG9L1W7bmM5d6uilTX0/OF8Phq0Ek+Qin2oQVgluL htams7xg/5pOI2pNZ9rvnNybMtzqumRqqWTDwFnIaFgV4ozt8slZJcMI6jCPgYYG0PiD ES0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=WkhSNMNX5AghpZ1EplPI2sMAgcklx5hBILV9dsWLvyk=; b=LmE690B1N/PjQQmR2FT5EYLiMliegvO4D1H/MmW3oqEbFolttjlDofutTm4XZU8Yrr JWJgv6OGDdiEwjmmcSzOQGFDCIcirwie7Q6Ks/9PY8VlRmcFIbkX5lS6LRK2tGfQSRNk NXHqVfx4GcvwdHEV3rmekXqDrXDjXbqrdGhWZsDGZQORZhEt94Q1XwPiriE7ESpnZMUA EJjQ8oGuJFgco4l087S2gsBX/sw/KeGhjGVHKqBXuWQkbQ7gqRUFCPfvE1YBf5znACVB vcZ0VJDXfcbcnt1IjDv3BY41pZJcxY4dZcdvEdp/ktTF6ODjZVGrrB5IJhHjq0XMLTWf Pdpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWJiAXzPk5+j9zoDWqlltu3y0w0tJ9h12/lgp1KOqwdWxvQvshW0dT3qHyyqr/RpD3Aa5kX+WG+A6VKHQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.10.109 with SMTP id h13mr1793163lbb.58.1460478266682; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.151.67 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160410181958.58762.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1604100736080.45987@rabdullah.local> <20160410181958.58762.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:24:26 -0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3Qj_X5n7gh0fKw-jIOMdv81lE5g
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgE_oOJSCjgsMGTSMDV2-LsUzw1zW3-+N_VCtE14m26BA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ATrwnb0jjlgg7741c-zOyijAWu0>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:24:35 -0000

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:19 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>The IETF has a meeting network requirements document that specifies a
>>number of parameters which includes no blocking.
>
> In London in 2014, do you know whether we were behind the national
> child porn filters?
>
> R's,
> John

I am not sure that they actually filter.

I think it rather more likely that if you were to surf to
kiddieporn.com from the Hilton Metropole, that you would find Mr Plod
knocking on your hotel room door 15 minutes later. That being the
driving time from New Scotland Yard.