IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 13 April 2016 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6651112DC51 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0l0pWyOh_tZL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB10F12DC23 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id a140so95813807wma.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=nWfSOz8ii02qwf+Almjtqe+At4TlrwwIEkOA05Fgxvg=; b=n8Jqjd2cg3/QAyNagxyjkS/32jQr/gHg2qGbl+fxvp8/o3LJL3kjxe+j0ZKlugE9jM fNpJp5SSYAPDDwPOopo1xasqpJD8LgiDNltD15i7JoR2U0FPQVRUn3aKx3kG1Lrx33NZ CW8ni+CUry297IK31grgTIa+UnDm0Bvw62kKvC9ZyjWY2/tDCIThvZ/szQO4h7wHxg1Y ssoh4s70WHJ0jj5oI0MyM5T7kHAsMHQ8H0wLmFyRSAG379jUbo1s6Dbr9EZetFxcoAZR 8+7hHN//U51+QLLrhwATBt1TDlVX8evcndk54X7azmROkVpqIFFQx+RdwIeHq5AFj6Kd rAcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=nWfSOz8ii02qwf+Almjtqe+At4TlrwwIEkOA05Fgxvg=; b=K685KiRoJpD43HjwG5fl9OcJ1kboxdGXQGBd3XDcBqjIY1J42F1/vmaY/H6tVU5kk6 B2CtkE/wArc1T3SFYUvUxgKOwaAbvb7Cgyx66XA5Sha3DmN8OHJXHP93q/+4PtpP9z5O Ce+XeHorooC3UGTdbBE55YTgXji3RHw7b5aS6aw7e5Wv++0PZC7/qq9PBjeNijXh6aQX PfgH37pYDwJp5W1esr4zbWpt3ZTVbNk33mT24WdlEFanDxIkJKi5dR4OPOgBKon6voG2 pYTrzJL5qSctELodjmDl17Gx61R+7J34oA3I2PZLedeay8pi+z92ObpBIBzakNSp52yQ dI1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXYshKymUzkBUxzpGX61gjO8jpxjjSx3CMm/gsvs6hcKQdK/4PdiSIDl98lvgQ6gA==
X-Received: by 10.194.202.168 with SMTP id kj8mr8734662wjc.8.1460547097514; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.111] ([199.203.248.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fu9sm26820020wjb.44.2016.04.13.04.31.36 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <570DAA2F.1040007@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:31:35 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <81B4533B-0F39-442D-8546-019D9253047A@gmail.com>
References: <570AB3AF.2050401@gmail.com> <87twj99c6w.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <CAKe6YvMyp-DyeDwpPY6KYmbDbnpgnvVk_cUStnA32wmgDWcz3w@mail.gmail.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233A62AA18@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <20160411104519.GA19092@gsp.org> <3F48466D-390C-4C18-B958-732AE3E46FF1@gmail.com> <20160411223403.GA6743@gsp.org> <87twj7eon7.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <20160412110839.GA20488@gsp.org> <8760vn82f2.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <20160412124639.GA27223@gsp.org> <570DAA2F.1040007@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Ha_8ozRt-5RLVKF-zoTl319Jtkk>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:31:40 -0000

> On 13 Apr 2016, at 5:08 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Cherry-picking a few points:
> On 13/04/2016 00:46, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> ...
>> And the difficulties/expense of travel are only going to get worse
>> for the forseeable future: they're not going to get better.
> 
> That is indisputable.

OK, I’ll bite. 

Expense goes up and down with the price of oil, competition, regulation and a zillion other factors. 

Difficulty?  Why do you think that is getting worse?  There was an increase in hassle shortly after 9/11, but I haven’t experienced any greater difficulties now as opposed to 10 years ago. Why do you think it’s set to become more difficult?

Yoav

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email