Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]

<chopps@chopps.org> Tue, 12 April 2016 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB8912E5D8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ak0jlUffN23 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7796D12E596 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tops.chopps.org (24-247-68-31.dhcp.trcy.mi.charter.com [24.247.68.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C04E661166; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:07:27 +0000 (UTC)
References: <570AB3AF.2050401@gmail.com> <87twj99c6w.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <CAKe6YvMyp-DyeDwpPY6KYmbDbnpgnvVk_cUStnA32wmgDWcz3w@mail.gmail.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233A62AA18@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <20160411104519.GA19092@gsp.org> <3F48466D-390C-4C18-B958-732AE3E46FF1@gmail.com> <20160411223403.GA6743@gsp.org> <87twj7eon7.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <20160412110839.GA20488@gsp.org> <8760vn82f2.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <20160412124639.GA27223@gsp.org> <87fuurgd8f.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <CABmDk8kCfTB_AKyqV4X+AghL2G7i+XcKR=tzV0jybM05k+UU4Q@mail.gmail.com> <65989154-BD08-45F0-B6F0-2AE3E435409C@chopps.org> <570D2BAD.7000307@gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1
From: <chopps@chopps.org>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
In-reply-to: <570D2BAD.7000307@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:07:26 -0400
Message-ID: <87a8kyhfa9.fsf@tops.chopps.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zH5AXByREeVvPG5tYKExvHKcjcw>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:07:31 -0000

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> writes:

> On 4/12/16 6:20 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>> I think we need to look at a good sampling of the data at this point.
>
> Have at it.

I would like to actually. :) I'm wondering how I might go about getting
all the email From addresses from every WG archive for the last year.
I'm thinking if all archives are now hosted by mailman there's probably
a way to script this.

Thanks,
Chris.

>
> Melinda