Re: Old directions in social media.
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 06 January 2021 18:53 UTC
Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996C73A10D7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 10:53:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m6nVITaATfyu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 10:53:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313523A10B3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 10:53:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E78F746 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 13:53:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:53:17 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=4j970y fGj042sTwBk4PNs67yI+8fgaivJR44MZGnLyM=; b=DaNmHu71sQ7sUDeSlCnbTL 9MgF8uHg2V+uvqeGMT1aWvQzXyHjSNpfC8QOBYeblsASbWSpjH6pAXaL9eURpU+K B0gEaWmUNCXwzVDRR3je9+jpjCq//7AYf6GdX/DXdrqgfPypTTVMVtWh2NBFJ5xP 4vJr1gb/D1wiRY/BpUDgV2ewMe/ESPeg0N+9hLNLurwF0xrEt+4ml+pUXAMOtzBv bJnxrhT7xtj4D1jB2GJo9bfpbOeRf3YZPj387+pE5WFJOBquzB2SVhXy+3tdEifk Y+XFij7HEcjB41+6D49H/SMKon99VKZZwEJCHMKG4pOwPLoIyfAHq8t8QWOYDaSQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:HAf2X2tJG-pVpci_5A7XweMl_j7MN7DuzB8LmqtmKRzXb1aeAe5PTg> <xme:HAf2X7eALvJGTd_AoaCnWJPFSuxR6PGe57Sis74bvQwmJjaYBRLGqgxHJdSzK5bHA 9QabTrdhtYSbQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdegtddgvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgesrgdtre ertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfiho rhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveefteduieegtd elvddvtddufeejjeffvdefteejieeulefgtdfggedtffektedunecukfhppedutdekrddv vddurddukedtrdduheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:HAf2XxyQhTe1MLgpq4lAitdwz6eWx1iNyhwLOt14F7WvZrFaQBIsXQ> <xmx:HAf2XxPwCgozaSKXVuION9Jo0EXfewF-uN51yRjVLnMiWky_gdDlEg> <xmx:HAf2X28OISKWb_-m7BAkLo07bAiZWiAvooKAbg2GdlDMzyOkX2smpQ> <xmx:HAf2XwepQd3lI7Nq-EbJaOGZetbklW404PZrmUtY5As1CLgMEpdutw>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 464A8240057 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 13:53:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Old directions in social media.
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+Lwg1-pxKU8vMinFDUbVca52VgFzTOOSJMnJjaUJvF6PLew@mail.gmail.com> <519a0e4d-7102-fac8-1517-04c590a80080@network-heretics.com> <MN2PR11MB43668BD4EE84EDCCA9C8062AB5D00@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <8d37d121-3f47-43b4-93ae-036068121b08@network-heretics.com> <91FCD1A5-050D-476D-8EEA-38CB43DE20F1@akamai.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <87436d16-cb4c-b0dc-2a68-e8722b44cf1f@network-heretics.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:53:15 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <91FCD1A5-050D-476D-8EEA-38CB43DE20F1@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------84C09CE762C602EE174199F2"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9XPmfwZRmrcYw9ct_eSS5bQb3PM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:53:21 -0000
On 1/6/21 1:48 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > * I guess I'm wondering: what are the actual virtues of github > (other than that some people are already familiar with it) > > You brush that aside as if it’s of no consequence. GitHub claims As of > January 2020, GitHub reports having over 52 million users**and more > than 28 million public repositories. Since we want to engage the open > source community, it behooves to make accomodations, rather than try > to say “use this, it’s better.” Fortunately, the accommodation is > something the IETF has already approved, and left use of to individual > working groups. > No it does not, if it comes at a cost of impairing broad participation in IETF. > > * But mostly, to me, github looks like a huge impediment > > By my reckoning, you’re in the rough here. Even if the entire IETF > community agreed with you – and they don’t – the percentage would > still be a round-off error and approximates to zero. > Actually, you're in the rough here. Several people have expressed reservations about github which you disregard with a wave of your hand. But it really doesn't matter, because we're having a discussion not a consensus call. Keith
- Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- RE: Old directions in social media. Larry Masinter
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kurt Andersen (IETF)
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. - Issue track… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. - Issue track… Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Fred Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Stephen Farrell
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. avri doria
- Re: Old directions in social media. John C Klensin
- Re: Old directions in social media. John C Klensin
- Re: Old directions in social media. Fred Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Mark Nottingham
- Re: Old directions in social media. John C Klensin
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Wes Hardaker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Richardson
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- RE: Old directions in social media. Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- RE: Old directions in social media. Larry Masinter
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Vittorio Bertola
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel Halpern Direct
- RE: Old directions in social media. ned+ietf
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Tim Bray
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Richardson
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Carsten Bormann
- Re: Old directions in social media. Stephen Farrell
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Eliot Lear
- Re: Old directions in social media. Carsten Bormann
- Re: Old directions in social media. Carsten Bormann
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Old directions in social media. Wes Hardaker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. tom petch
- RE: Old directions in social media. ned+ietf
- Re: Old directions in social media. Nick Hilliard
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Richardson
- Re: Old directions in social media. John C Klensin
- Re: Old directions in social media. Eliot Lear
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Lloyd W