IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Old directions in social media. - Issue trackers

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 05 January 2021 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C13E3A0F7F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:31:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_DOTEDU=1.149] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ednnXZh_9kbx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335EF3A0F61 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 105JT3oK006323 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 19:31:36 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=oRd1MnveiRNP3DRiEzLQ57jxTV4fYFoPToMdAbkWN1E=; b=XdewgGB8OqDS0pc1kArtyU7bsxY6wDC8IgSIOgznErk5zqH8mztkglTkUQ6t5A91ay8p /riTqVu8qacaUYIoRaCNUR/zs9tIhBwLhDsfaGghgoOWasM76otoEkndpDb+o7Rs7lYH 0WeQX7sXv4faOHwmVQQ6d9ut9XZkSo1J+GQn2lVyzivVLBfTegEPUAz2kohNYp++hgqh YCmg7kiOMCVtBUthjK2hlbGmFtk+Cxn1YlqgbdOzHTO7DcipgXplpZadbUq9OK8FN1Xl fO0L6CAaD0anwx6pXITnqBgLbHuSOTTpgh7qX3a3hlXhGqXJBg1Ov/Rl3wgV8xNx6gY4 GQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 35thc6xjb8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 19:31:36 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 105JKGaw006593 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:31:35 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 35tn23faux-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:31:35 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:31:34 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.010; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:31:34 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Old directions in social media. - Issue trackers
Thread-Topic: Old directions in social media. - Issue trackers
Thread-Index: AQHW45d4bSsRfl9Xrk+7GsOPfmyg+6oZa1gA
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 19:31:34 +0000
Message-ID: <7F1ADE12-4720-4F79-9F34-EA22F1AECD05@akamai.com>
References: <07DC5B1D-7B79-422B-BABC-C6A124359C88@nbcuni.com> <3ba06742-1102-984b-dc78-960c33a46027@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ba06742-1102-984b-dc78-960c33a46027@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.44.20121301
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <69E7264465AC354098C042EEF056B944@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-05_06:2021-01-05, 2021-01-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=618 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101050109
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-05_06:2021-01-05, 2021-01-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=535 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101050111
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.61) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint6
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/z7_K3ahwLMugFfuybjvCRaKUJUw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 19:31:38 -0000

>  As 
>    long as the discussion is visible and understandable (yes, I am 
>    repeating myself) on the email list.

Did you ever read any moderated mailing lists, such as the RISKS digest, or any other digest?  Did you ever reply to such a posting? Did you use Usenet? What about messages where people top-post, use fonts for emphasis, or *like this* or _like this_ ?  What about emoticons? After all, they MIME was 1996, and the smiley was 1982 [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sef/].

"Visible and understandable" sounds like truisms, but are meaningless without qualifiers. Got metrics?  Or should we just add "to me"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email