Re: Old directions in social media.

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Wed, 06 January 2021 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C44D3A0E65 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 07:13:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.013
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GiiRuoHnxGl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 07:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB763A0E4B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 07:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id q4so1681874plr.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 07:13:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=IpTMZ0wzfMPgy+CVSmJRG7J/g6vBNFkUGXnKnQDwGkw=; b=NgVG+SwowOBsn1Pw69cKflkWHz4RFOhFwXjHCrF4gxZlgkko6b0WtA0Yu7fsU8a/cS Ogr1CoHOiex9s5UN0M4EAlsPPf+IykAHs59Ue/Zdzcz0LqkcSPQ7+SDNUHOArzZOa0li 6nLmx/StBpZUXr7VEyZL0QH6CQa67vkO8l3jOZLFHUZxXXnO0IhrSgjfVwSWSj3tyERW DWJocOxuNIsKix70jbFrj8ptoB/PfGWmtg3nnMcaheKhvW/kkedVeXyEUqtOs0DCFG+L b5dCnJrL2jNGUWDmBKQW4qIuUQoaYmhWEs0idJgSD5iXiO925QAZcu4Si5Mg/tQjUI5H GnLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=IpTMZ0wzfMPgy+CVSmJRG7J/g6vBNFkUGXnKnQDwGkw=; b=EasLgpi6HKraibFMzJYvpbxk9PRayD+NTxewdl7ChlmShJrE/4AnetzFWOqiQrGNHW zA+IU5WwSPLspmK+uClHxiswvR/Ao3sWqKcDv5IjEy8QpPtmZyEHKMV609TrWQsvLdD5 /0HnlxD4SPt6S5zz4MWCiWCGTOC59PQHbqfD1VtnmIeilsHo7pvHSnWPsBgCtHZ83pVO iJYu9ftUxiJPr+iI8VxrY1bT3IpusIma9cr6W0YRh3yO1yOxUjW6hMAXruSYpsCIQ7fT oLoIft6HtaWNl+exjUGZ8q97HXMMg1LFtVJIPevNNXDjqNRjfDhTsiryiwWy1BOOCwnN Q+ug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PHEfKPBbuqiXpWihQZksDTAgP7u3Ic09RCw9VRWM7a1HYmqXn oz0/vAu4OO4e6z5P25OblPKEkqCWMgL3yo0u
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwinNhj6cUFhCC0kBFcXFDOD2CzBziPywVIZV6+7UXv6hT3F9O2tXoNznOV4qbDmiUXtlwLlg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b58f:b029:dc:8e14:95b4 with SMTP id a15-20020a170902b58fb02900dc8e1495b4mr4960873pls.24.1609945984381; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 07:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-39-88.volcanocom.com. [107.182.39.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u68sm2684925pfb.70.2021.01.06.07.13.02 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jan 2021 07:13:03 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Old directions in social media.
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+Lwg1-pxKU8vMinFDUbVca52VgFzTOOSJMnJjaUJvF6PLew@mail.gmail.com> <519a0e4d-7102-fac8-1517-04c590a80080@network-heretics.com> <CAJU8_nUU0Km_YtgpWbLF-JVQVUXFYvxBNBYbzaLOXBqQyvvUaA@mail.gmail.com> <062d01d6e387$39c46270$ad4d2750$@acm.org> <CAJU8_nWD3MwLs5aVNMi_3LqZysrfjv0N7N3ujV-zhqxiFh3tsA@mail.gmail.com> <788651ca-0c84-7a54-9c48-b962faed635f@network-heretics.com> <CAJU8_nXSE-E2AVrJnqe5ZifR+qGhXscNCFXQRDj_GU1r=hNOyw@mail.gmail.com> <70416f47-7c31-8571-02ce-f95ff386d54f@network-heretics.com> <X/TtgTtl02AMyns8@mit.edu> <AM0PR08MB371623409DE8AB03CC667234FAD00@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <866b1357-ec50-7765-4277-fd4fba8d793e@network-heretics.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <16e28d8d-f184-9084-9473-37d56621391a@mtcc.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 07:13:02 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <866b1357-ec50-7765-4277-fd4fba8d793e@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KfoGY7kxJHsEA49bJRoCU7z-71Y>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 15:13:07 -0000

On 1/6/21 4:58 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
> On 1/6/21 2:56 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>
>> The good thing is that there is no real problem here. In most working 
>> groups a limited number of people actively participate. Those people 
>> know how to contribute. For those who just browse through groups from 
>> time to time it got more difficult to see where the center of 
>> attention currently is.
>
> I would claim that what you describe *is* a real problem.   IETF works 
> best when it benefits from a wide range of input, including 
> "cross-area" input and input from generalists.   When working groups 
> consist of a small number of people who do whatever they want in their 
> narrow areas of concern, groups have a greater tendency to work at 
> cross-purposes with one another.
>
I disagree. Most of the time the soi-disant "generalilsts" are just 
self-aggrandizing and like to hear themselves speak. I remember when we 
were creating the DKIM working group we had a whole bunch of them and 
their "input" ended up contributing nothing at all other than delay.

Mike