Re: Old directions in social media.
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 06 January 2021 00:21 UTC
Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3A83A0E25 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:21:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.18 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQC6EVQ6XwR9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:21:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6962E3A0CE5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:21:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9FB5C0042 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 19:21:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 19:21:16 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=1yHD+L beyLHFbRxX/zfO9Gt/5vgviMsYILfPFyr5u0c=; b=k0CT2/odqCAMeS/1vJUX6F mRpxPF+1/+PljN+SMvtnv/kDI9+vBdWYU04P0x81jOu9afFz4Hs+uno7gZ1c62KL g6gXCXjexZb28c2Rz+1+2s5ABMAeBqxYVrHYA3K2jkVPYxqnMfReRvGboyYVbgE1 EUFrqQZN1Bj3ddBHjzAU4ln4LEvNDUsR24r86tLVdJ6n2LtuqZYbew+2HcpiBIiK PED30M8C/ycCz6Cly5PSVWjmogRJ1imbrd4E50IWSg/iglFMoUGLE0s8TpjcXT9Q cM//C1B/ozs1He1LRYCl7S7YEv5p66x02qNpYzpC5+5wQ9ySzLoMfQaiAOj38bWA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:fAL1X3H1nSXeMUrdnXc4kU8hqawivr-QVUIGtkvI5AghRJn8Xq92kQ> <xme:fAL1X0Uj53jB4-PJCC6IeDUv1pXONQIBSAg_38BM9XVflWGRf21wJb6BHpzf9bnU6 6k6oGwhwifPnQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdefkedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgesrgdtre ertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfiho rhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveefteduieegtd elvddvtddufeejjeffvdefteejieeulefgtdfggedtffektedunecukfhppedutdekrddv vddurddukedtrdduheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:fAL1X5JaFnWbpiRh00M7k7LdUlrm19fOyf9V1zHGhbKWHVT66TWvkg> <xmx:fAL1X1EoX0-7kexWAWRxjXxAYidomULZj3-mtrJ1wyULkokVZS18Ig> <xmx:fAL1X9W0rO64SqmJAKNvCOgcIOkoRZ4s3dGfMEVedpWTRomSdYSmdA> <xmx:fAL1XyVnYDXZ3ci_gIHuIY0ygYSALmgdsg5CsP-sPRO16xt1aiDi0g>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0B7D824005E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 19:21:15 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Old directions in social media.
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+Lwg1-pxKU8vMinFDUbVca52VgFzTOOSJMnJjaUJvF6PLew@mail.gmail.com> <519a0e4d-7102-fac8-1517-04c590a80080@network-heretics.com> <CAJU8_nUU0Km_YtgpWbLF-JVQVUXFYvxBNBYbzaLOXBqQyvvUaA@mail.gmail.com> <062d01d6e387$39c46270$ad4d2750$@acm.org> <CAJU8_nWD3MwLs5aVNMi_3LqZysrfjv0N7N3ujV-zhqxiFh3tsA@mail.gmail.com> <788651ca-0c84-7a54-9c48-b962faed635f@network-heretics.com> <CAJU8_nXSE-E2AVrJnqe5ZifR+qGhXscNCFXQRDj_GU1r=hNOyw@mail.gmail.com> <70416f47-7c31-8571-02ce-f95ff386d54f@network-heretics.com> <X/TtgTtl02AMyns8@mit.edu> <201A6AE0AE9C0C7FA0E5206C@PSB> <C235A8C4-BABC-4A64-96C6-9D8CC847C1C1@mnot.net>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <2af035b4-c1c3-16c6-fc44-4f2d48b32e9e@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 19:21:15 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C235A8C4-BABC-4A64-96C6-9D8CC847C1C1@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------033B1AEA7F24660F48BEEE80"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/YvZSenzlx_-sibTnw5wjsqYSfLY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:21:21 -0000
On 1/5/21 7:05 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > I think the same could be said about decisions that are made on obscure mailing lists -- many developers refuse to subscribe to them now because of their awful usability problems. Not sure what you mean by "obscure", but I believe that IETF may have too many mailing lists, with a bad habit of (whether deliberately or not) squelching difficult discussions by spinning up more and more lists that people have to then subscribe to and follow. Also not sure which "awful usability problems" you're referring to, because some people seem to think that even using email at all (and sifting through the spam and the scams and the automatically generated messages from other tools, and perhaps also just reading traffic from other contributors) are impositions. But I will certainly agree that having to subscribe to lots of new mailing lists makes for a poor user interface. Keith p.s. 20+ ago I decided to subscribe to each IETF list using a unique email address so that I could route each list's traffic to its own subfolder. But after IETF lists started to "moderate" messages from non-subscribers, I had to either change my From address for each list (which I didn't want to do because I wanted that address to be used only for list traffic and not private replies), or subscribe twice to each list, once using the unique address and another time (with email turned off) from my usual email address. I now think that it might have been a mistake to put each list in a separate folder, because it seems to be more difficult to keep up with multiple lists that way. This might be because the number of folders is more than will fit in the height of a full-screen window, and I haven't found a mail user agent that lets me effectively keep track of not only which folders have new messages, but which folders haven't been read in awhile. (MUA user interfaces seem to have stagnated in the late 1990s, with many products actually getting worse since then.) I've tried using the IMAP interface to read multiple lists without having to subscribe to them, but after investing multiple hours on multiple occasions, never got it to work well. Vaguely speaking I get the impression that we're often drowning in "solutions" (not just in IETF), and what we need might not be /more/ solutions so much as /simpler/ ones.
- Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- RE: Old directions in social media. Larry Masinter
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kurt Andersen (IETF)
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. - Issue track… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. - Issue track… Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Fred Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Stephen Farrell
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. avri doria
- Re: Old directions in social media. John C Klensin
- Re: Old directions in social media. John C Klensin
- Re: Old directions in social media. Fred Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Mark Nottingham
- Re: Old directions in social media. John C Klensin
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Wes Hardaker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Richardson
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- RE: Old directions in social media. Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- RE: Old directions in social media. Larry Masinter
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Vittorio Bertola
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel Halpern Direct
- RE: Old directions in social media. ned+ietf
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Tim Bray
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Richardson
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Carsten Bormann
- Re: Old directions in social media. Stephen Farrell
- RE: Old directions in social media. Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Old directions in social media. Eliot Lear
- Re: Old directions in social media. Carsten Bormann
- Re: Old directions in social media. Carsten Bormann
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Thomas
- Re: Old directions in social media. Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Old directions in social media. Wes Hardaker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. Kyle Rose
- Re: Old directions in social media. tom petch
- RE: Old directions in social media. ned+ietf
- Re: Old directions in social media. Nick Hilliard
- Re: Old directions in social media. Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Old directions in social media. Michael Richardson
- Re: Old directions in social media. John C Klensin
- Re: Old directions in social media. Eliot Lear
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Salz, Rich
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Old directions in social media. Keith Moore
- Re: Old directions in social media. Lloyd W