IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Remote participation fees

Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it> Sun, 15 February 2015 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <spromano@unina.it>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2022A1A013B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:15:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EqC5Zn7OGZIC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:15:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brc2.unina.it (brc2.unina.it [192.132.34.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05DB1A0154 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:15:17 -0800 (PST)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1424031310-05f2751b14bccea0001-h9jmKw
Received: from smtp2.unina.it (smtp2.unina.it [192.132.34.62]) by brc2.unina.it with ESMTP id RcjNgND0PgoBtXLW (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 15 Feb 2015 21:15:10 +0100 (CET)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: spromano@unina.it
X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 192.132.34.62
Received: from u554079.nwas2.nw2.tachikawa.mopera.net ([37.227.113.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.unina.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1FKF39h032262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 15 Feb 2015 21:15:05 +0100
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D6F1EBA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <54DE7F09.8030500@gmail.com> <C5FC0DB6-82F8-4C38-ABFD-D5D9A6E65933@isoc.org.ec> <54DE90C6.6030609@gmail.com> <E39AF4E0-58AB-4249-8A37-3D1CD2D5A691@gmail.com> <54DE9844.1010807@gmail.com> <61FBB27B-4EF3-40A0-8981-00EB89698295@isoc.org.ec> <B90F5E29-06C5-41D1-9F31-1BE42382995F@gmail.com> <CABmDk8=YPZ1W2tTOqP23U2PFVLoDh-3+wwmcA8mpta-Y05op2A@mail.gmail.com> <54DFBAF6.30409@cs.tcd.ie> <71F05D3C-95F1-4424-B6AA-49EBCCB7065A@isoc.org> <20150214225128.GS14296@verdi> <B754B188-1FC2-4E6B-B374-F3B882D99742@nominum.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D6F1EBA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----BIB3A92X36PGTMAT8T48D9X5T1S0IC"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: RE: Remote participation fees
From: Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it>
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Remote participation fees
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 21:15:01 +0100
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
Message-ID: <FF61611B-D392-4531-8DC9-D29D2DF2A267@unina.it>
X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp2.unina.it[192.132.34.62]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1424031310
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA
X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.132.34.42:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
Received-SPF: softfail (unina.it: domain of transitioning spromano@unina.it does not designate 37.227.113.36 as permitted sender)
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at unina.it
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=BSF_SPF_SOFTFAIL, HTML_MESSAGE
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.15350 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.00 BSF_SPF_SOFTFAIL Custom Rule SPF Softfail
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FrU1NnEypX8XMpMBPp2UNReiwz8>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:15:21 -0000

Hello Christer, 

we have discussed this multiple times in the past. Ftom the technical standpoint, moderation (involving both locals and remotes) can indeed be implemented in many different ways (some of which are based on IETF standards, btw). We (Meetecho) have proposed and run an experiment called UMPIRE, whose details can be found, e. g., on the vmeet mailing list.

Cheers,

Simon

Il 15 Febbraio 2015 12:40:16 CET, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> ha scritto:
>Hi,
>
>It can't be that difficult to make a tool that everyone (including
>those participating f2f) use to "line up" behind the microphone.
>
>Many virtual meeting tools already provide a raise-your-hand feature.
>
>Regards,
>
>Christer
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
>Sent: 15 February 2015 04:11
>To: John Leslie
>Cc: ietf@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: Remote participation fees
>
>On Feb 14, 2015, at 5:51 PM, John Leslie <john@jlc.net> wrote:
>>   Is there anybody besides the Meetecho folks whose task it is to 
>> "make it work"? Is there anybody _including_ the Meetecho folks who 
>> has the ability to arrange similar priority at the mike to that of 
>> on-site participants?
>
>A tremendous amount of work goes on behind the scenes to make this
>work, not just the meetecho folks.   I remember reporting a problem in
>a meeting and having Alexa show up five minutes later checking to see
>if it was fixed, and I know that other folks from AMS and from the NOC
>work hard on this.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email