Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 11 January 2015 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4861F1A1A90 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:01:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qeUhYKlXm1uO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:01:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AD2C1A1A4D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:01:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E63B2002A; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:07:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A0620637FE; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:01:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D10F637EA; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:01:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
In-Reply-To: <201501101833.t0AIXIJV019319@colo4.roaringpenguin.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <9772.1420830216@sandelman.ca> <54B02B51.1070308@cs.tcd.ie> <5237.1420905553@sandelman.ca> <201501101833.t0AIXIJV019319@colo4.roaringpenguin.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:01:47 -0500
Message-ID: <22216.1421006507@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/M-xVgAyyPQE_z0qGuPW_tuZ4uwg>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:01:54 -0000

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> wrote:
    >> That's why I wrote "contribution" --- we could imagine some system of
    >> points, with the datatracker being the scoreboard, but I'm not clear
    >> that we need an particularly complex system or overly restrictive
    >> system.

    > But we do need - my strongly held opinion - an "objective" one and
    > that's harder to craft with respect to the definition of
    > "contribution".  Whereas simply counting meetings is objective and
    > repeatable.

    > To be honest, I foresee a spate of throw away IDs being crafted to be
    > counted as contributions and that might not be all that useful for our
    > process.

Yeah, but that's why I wrote that the document uploader (pressed submit) on a
     document that *was scheduled into a WG session*

So, it requires that the WG chair be involved, and thus there is a system of
account.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-