Re: "Blue sheets" [ Interim meetings - changing the way we work]

"Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Fri, 27 February 2015 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281881ACCDE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:02:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5_uXmGLjtjqz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:02:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FED1ACCDC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:02:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE0F14813C6; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:03:23 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFAYPb2d4jlF; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:03:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from newdev.cadm.harvard.edu (newdev.cadm.harvard.edu [128.103.229.199]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC20114813AC; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:03:21 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Subject: Re: "Blue sheets" [ Interim meetings - changing the way we work]
From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <54EF7423.4070202@queuefull.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:02:25 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0F50C3DF-8EE1-455A-84A1-D5C685CDE0BA@sobco.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <9772.1420830216@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwZatYW2e4Wk6GXB2U26fsCn8BV2qt-07kHBugiq34zrcQ@mail.gmail.com> <6025.1423672358@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwYtE618sA99hgXP-5wk+BYdcXLbiZqd_36OreYQ1LB7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <732CCD31-0F13-472F-9825-C5F5D650C41B@vigilsec.com> <2457EE06-4960-40B5-AF10-2EDFBF18B2B6@nominum.com> <7C601AA4-55C4-43FE-B2FE-1D22BD73F166@vigilsec.com> <CAKHUCzyJ62hVyJVVLuL5-nXx_i5VO2cW3LA6R1sdZbDHxoY_Tw@mail.gmail.com> <43ADF7ED-6A42-4097-8FFA-5DA0FC21D07A@vigilsec.com> <CAKHUCzyfB+GhNqmDhrzki4tVn0faMLyt_cqgeHFcQL2b5pkkAQ@mail.gmail.com> <54DE3E1C.6060105@gmail.com> <007301d04927$64890d40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <54EDA697.5070107@cisco.com> <01c701d050f6$c80fcd00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <54EE0E9A.2060002@queuefull.net> <54EE75E1.1030009@gmail.com> <54EEA6AD.3000606@queuefull.net> <710C7275-6726-435D-A003-B5AE567C93EF@gmail.com> <54EF7423.4070202@queuefull.net>
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zotBR9Nn9IIhFpM-Cr1TDngTXw8>
Cc: netmod-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:02:30 -0000

the requirement in rf. 2418 is that a list of attendees needs to be provided to the Secretariat

the mechanism by which the list is created is not specified

Scott

> On Feb 26, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Yoav Nir wrote:
>>> On Feb 26, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Benson Schliesser<bensons@queuefull.net>  wrote:
>>> Of course, chairs being required to submit blue sheets is not the same as attendees being required to sign them.
>> 
>> They’re required to sign them in physical meetings. How are virtual interims different?
> 
> This *feels* like it should be true. But I can't find any definitive statement that requires attendees to sign blue sheets. Maybe I'm just overlooking it?
> 
> Cheers,
> -Benson
>