Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 07 January 2015 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39AF1A004B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:03:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WTi9AJgGpohs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05F421A0055 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l2so1550815wgh.21 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 09:03:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IAhCIkIZbJnL0z6Oh8mn6hIF72Koe0bTTUmC3M9+HgI=; b=IiRP3XiIo8BfHG2+2B9fS1knW0zQfwsUfAqN45h2rEYZ49ZuP70Wvl1Wg7D8wnd3wM rnBYjYs+PL/3WgCvvn3oKljuBKSOlAR4v77cgMmk1pNLGTPUdN8CaHxyhqZxxxImYYEi U+NfIEvObRjmVi8Wc+w4WyPTX7XC5VFBmmgscX9OK9/hwKykofUFUrKyjRqZ4ZAVWieX XKzJfX41pT1aIew5np4n+7saFl5XzrEMpyDvj3Pj6biBHLwY+HAhxrumw2W9asT7SBL4 0pPhe16wba4mbRytwAwbVwTxO4KqDDHEbKpICwdwtP6LEYCeDf63Yimrm2QKX6Qh7wWy DFaA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id p7mr8176312wjz.89.1420650187700; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 09:03:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:03:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:03:07 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0102e498c9c99d050c12e520
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MrkzstXVTNubeVhtqKurV75BLv4
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:03:11 -0000


RFC7437 has been published, which is now the consolidated version of BCP 10
with no changes made.  Thanks to those of you who provided reviews and
input to make sure I got it right.

As promised, I've now published draft-kucherawy-rfc7437bis which is the
opportunity for the community to begin suggesting revisions to the NomCom
processes and definitions.

This first version is basically RFC7437 verbatim, except with the stuff
about previous versions and the consolidation effort removed or otherwise
cleaned up.  It's there so we can track its evolution relative to the
present BCP 10 as it evolves.

The first change I'd like to propose is that the IAOC Liaison to the NomCom
be codified.  It's currently only an unwritten common practice.

Have at it!