Re: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Mon, 16 February 2015 06:13 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7D01A873D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:13:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DjIDzqPxSWTo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:13:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f169.google.com (mail-pd0-f169.google.com [209.85.192.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93D4E1A8739 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:13:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pdjy10 with SMTP id y10so32999899pdj.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:13:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JDB614lO4ZxfIkI9KvdaNgnnZk/MvG/MMhLPGaKPSAE=; b=F6+fLWRliYOxfrSi7sXCi2oG1HZ90HH+7V4X9RiiyngMVLTf0ScjxWYfoJEN3I+kTq NIosXLmT7+PZrtNlJzTTYxjYJkbhkmEdnUJgou5ToxdhD5XwGaaPW/3FYHy1HoKTsXlb 5GYiqW5eaw50pmMHkKtDHC1ZxEwyhDX+v75XwWMlrdP6qIfIyOSbmUZVf4O1bF85cY2+ xS2SaUKzgu2yrdhvUiABwXL8LYrWyzUnXUCTtJNt0Oxb+CxpHgBjoBxbYfi93FZDEGsV 89NzKWEnjTh5m1o+UHz3alkePdRbIj6B7PnwyTUEioCBSfiKB8nWcUc0OH3cxh8ij/Fh aB3g==
X-Received: by 10.70.50.41 with SMTP id z9mr36803559pdn.31.1424067197288; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:13:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-25-153-rb2.sol.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.25.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g7sm1494315pdm.4.2015.02.15.22.13.14 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54E18A77.9000309@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 21:13:11 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <54DBD71C.20101@joelhalpern.com> <26803.1423772214@sandelman.ca> <tsla90ikh85.fsf@mit.edu> <37661D4B-1842-4890-88FB-2A7B13CDC884@nominum.com> <CABmDk8m1KuSs8os9V7fcYOJC2O4yMb6dRFer+nEPBTTSHtey9Q@mail.gmail.com> <31891031-4628-49CD-B66C-38A3BD787B70@trammell.ch> <54DE7F09.8030500@gmail.com> <C5FC0DB6-82F8-4C38-ABFD-D5D9A6E65933@isoc.org.ec> <54DE90C6.6030609@gmail.com> <E39AF4E0-58AB-4249-8A37-3D1CD2D5A691@gmail.com> <54DE9844.1010807@gmail.com> <61FBB27B-4EF3-40A0-8981-00EB89698295@isoc.org.ec> <B90F5E29-06C5-41D1-9F31-1BE42382995F@gmail.com> <CABmDk8=YPZ1W2tTOqP23U2PFVLoDh-3+wwmcA8mpta-Y05op2A@mail.gmail.com> <54DFBAF6.30409@cs.tcd.ie> <CABmDk8nKHZZ0HQqgTSB=qc9wEbUaSOSsdKYyNjRf2wGF-XsLvQ@mail.gmail.com> <54DFE555.3060809@cs.tcd.ie> <CAKHUCzy=XHCWH63_-evMcJPXFr0BF9Xdkf1+NDdQQoyrRRy+9A@mail.gmail.com> <AB7481FF-09A2-4168-89FC-DDBE68F3F06F@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <AB7481FF-09A2-4168-89FC-DDBE68F3F06F@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rBzqKaP41zg9IUzA97SgyuS2z5Y>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 06:13:19 -0000

On 2/15/15 4:43 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> What would really help with this problem, and I think would actually
> result in better line discipline, would be if the chairs ran a queue
> of commenters and anybody, on-site or remote, could put themselves on
> the queue, but you couldn't talk if you weren't on the queue.  

I'm not going to pretend to be expert in the ways of the W3C, but
I did go to the recent TPAC meeting and have participated in some
calls, and they use IRC channels for this (and for other tasks),
with what appears to be considerable success.  So, it's not just
possible, but attainable, I think.

Melinda