Re: Interim meetings - changing the way we work

Benson Schliesser <> Thu, 26 February 2015 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618D81A1BA7 for <>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:42:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GHh5U4umMbjd for <>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:42:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07C5B1A1B85 for <>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:42:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id i50so10546925qgf.2 for <>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:42:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vs1zpmqFD/Re6lTQASdWLsXRRnvA0SgFZ+jBSTSP2vw=; b=hBavlw+wv1mh2PvNkhEaPsRsk3FDhaY2p7A4M2FJwUa5IX1TLPAe7D/7qQbmjdZ7xb 6HfjKTYosD15oJdYMfIR0LCC0Ca3MfHALqVeEKgq+KoTDqqShi00YSNnwvpPn5ntl4nt sXEaocrjZzvb3xR0KHxuWm9ZbfL2fm/c8jlHZA0RdiW4uEADY9BNuSaNijRFBaXmwDVy ti2NOIch5Qea1KRXFyLF7+1bpAi1S8hJhnLPWrjgAuX+KdfiBPowh2lEy7Rpfjw8QLA6 S77NDN4SaNXFm9GG19S7UV28kHHLpxAp/2eeCVwumkarAUV5v5Cqlsx8Xlh/N80D89qm 4H4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlqvxGMjUUOyr5GKyD+LQddmHIYhxEy0vKHCQ5qIGvUkTMmgzCT3f2grQheqr9uJ0R438d2
X-Received: by with SMTP id g199mr21760168qhc.89.1424979758269; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:42:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from desolation.local ( []) by with ESMTPSA id o7sm315647qge.8.2015. (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:42:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:42:36 -0500
From: Benson Schliesser <>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nico Williams <>
Subject: Re: Interim meetings - changing the way we work
References: <> <> <> <> <> <007301d04927$64890d40$> <> <01c701d050f6$c80fcd00$> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Cc: ietf <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:42:41 -0000

Nico Williams wrote:
> Yes, but a record that a concall or other interim meeting took place,
> and who attended, even if there are incomplete or missing minutes, is
> important for IPR reasons.  Ensuring that such meetings are NOTE WELL
> meetings is (should be) a priority, and that includes ensuring that a
> record of that much exists.
> Ideally the concalls and other interims would be recorded.

I agree completely. My point was that meeting records (including 
minutes) will inevitably be incomplete, or possibly inaccurate, and that 
relying on the mailing list as an authoritative record is more effective.

Of course it is disappointing that we can't meaningfully translate voice 
discussions into text, in the minutes or in mailing list threads. If 
there were some magic tool e.g. that took better minutes then I'd be 
happy to use it. But otherwise, I think we just have to trust chairs to 
manage WG collaboration in whatever way is most effective for their WG's 

This will inevitably be suboptimal for some part of the population. (For 
instance, I've never been able to find an interim meeting time that fits 
the schedules of all attendees.) But if they (we) always revert to the 
mailing list for decision making then I suspect our work can remain open 
and transparent.