Re: Remote participation fees

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Mon, 16 February 2015 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66651A8798 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 03:05:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKSGKdYW3L63 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 03:05:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D1C61A8794 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 03:05:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=916; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1424084726; x=1425294326; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gCbampt3Fzg9LD2yjEGl5Ifp9CDFTle5gvcxIfXK2s4=; b=GGk4ofvvWCpCox6Ax2JPT4AlfFPEZStSF31aJALvzpDpPj0nyRbeQBZs e8LvCaHrNKaAKmHLOBFQi5HrH5MqxGloKLrnqN0dS+NKiyr7L+VNPtvEK nprSfgONwAe/IWpJYoEyWG73iRo8aUYeLSZP1Gr5itSIl6kO9TSgVitxZ c=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,587,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="351274439"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2015 11:05:23 +0000
Received: from [64.103.108.122] (dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan301-64-103-108-122.cisco.com [64.103.108.122]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1GB5NkG027786; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:05:23 GMT
Message-ID: <54E1CEF3.1070301@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:05:23 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
Subject: Re: Remote participation fees
References: <54DE7F09.8030500@gmail.com> <C5FC0DB6-82F8-4C38-ABFD-D5D9A6E65933@isoc.org.ec> <54DE90C6.6030609@gmail.com> <E39AF4E0-58AB-4249-8A37-3D1CD2D5A691@gmail.com> <54DE9844.1010807@gmail.com> <61FBB27B-4EF3-40A0-8981-00EB89698295@isoc.org.ec> <B90F5E29-06C5-41D1-9F31-1BE42382995F@gmail.com> <CABmDk8=YPZ1W2tTOqP23U2PFVLoDh-3+wwmcA8mpta-Y05op2A@mail.gmail.com> <54DFBAF6.30409@cs.tcd.ie> <71F05D3C-95F1-4424-B6AA-49EBCCB7065A@isoc.org> <20150214225128.GS14296@verdi> <B754B188-1FC2-4E6B-B374-F3B882D99742@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <B754B188-1FC2-4E6B-B374-F3B882D99742@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cbWOWLjK6WF6ZBRC5EWoFRCft1s>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:05:31 -0000

On 15/02/2015 02:11, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2015, at 5:51 PM, John Leslie <john@jlc.net> wrote:
>>    Is there anybody besides the Meetecho folks whose task it is to
>> "make it work"? Is there anybody _including_ the Meetecho folks who
>> has the ability to arrange similar priority at the mike to that of
>> on-site participants?
> A tremendous amount of work goes on behind the scenes to make this work, not just the meetecho folks.   I remember reporting a problem in a meeting and having Alexa show up five minutes later checking to see if it was fixed, and I know that other folks from AMS and from the NOC work hard on this.
>
>
Ted

That regrettable and is because the technology that we deploy is still
too immature.

As engineers our goal should be to make this sort of technology
just work so that no one is doing any significant work behind the
scenes to make it work.

Stewart