Re: Remote participation fees

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 25 February 2015 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388041A0470 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:29:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.155
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.155 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FSL_HELO_FAKE=3.199, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QAwOIl-LOILZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98571A1A96 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDE62005E612; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:29:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=Q9lBmvezyAibMp 0+9JCCzlJ0x0g=; b=oZ/q6/SYzng5RlQG1J+ZYsO0pa+4M+gWyPam2mbK1vmhKG q5am2GH04e3PhWQVF6ms63QFP5mwhBJ0IejSI/uGc8J/CPsulXq7cj97DaqIaD2i vHRaqUNtji4P7rHSMsG97ym74Ghq02/n2RfbXLmj5ky8DrMfSxYsWns5i/hFc=
Received: from gmail.com (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a103.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 963F72005E607; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:29:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:29:41 -0600
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: Remote participation fees
Message-ID: <20150225182938.GB8631@gmail.com>
References: <61FBB27B-4EF3-40A0-8981-00EB89698295@isoc.org.ec> <B90F5E29-06C5-41D1-9F31-1BE42382995F@gmail.com> <CABmDk8=YPZ1W2tTOqP23U2PFVLoDh-3+wwmcA8mpta-Y05op2A@mail.gmail.com> <54DFBAF6.30409@cs.tcd.ie> <22998.1424015163@sandelman.ca> <DB3PR06MB219529AF019E530B47FBE!67BF210@DB3PR06MB219.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <5146CB6A-789D-4382-ACE8-9715B6C2AB92@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|bf7ae4bd312fe25b80a066e21ee84d67r1ODjZ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5146CB6A-789D-4382-ACE8-9715B6C2AB92@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <41798353-AA92-4476-A0BB-ECD2FEF96BF2@nominum.com> <20150225182407.GA8631@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150225182407.GA8631@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XFMA98epZt5tG7lS8UqvfDQ-1vs>
Cc: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:29:46 -0000

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:24:08PM -0600, Nico Williams wrote:
>         Participation in hallway conversations (and bar BoFs) are a key
> justification for on-site attendance, and it should continue being so.

I should add that being on site also forces one to make time for the
meeting, and that's another major justification for on-site attendance.