Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Fri, 13 February 2015 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F34D1A1B76 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:05:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYdYHTyaqu49 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:05:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9057F1A1B6E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:05:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id wo20so17351938obc.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:05:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=r6pM+18o2YteZTPOAN4Q3zfycm024/2S8zKMdQc8J3w=; b=Sx6VIki2/6/98QiCcU9SZZOPAFyYzESyiLynrwR8MRSzNzmdfJ3fZkCsD9+zqimY/r pXt5yQFWN+HUiCwamN7eLPi60TlSis6zS4Nc9nTkBEkfMzxKbJ0AlIdju2JlE8YNW4Se GT5cpdIt6sllODTdhnqypZZ7nXzYtgzG/PPVo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=r6pM+18o2YteZTPOAN4Q3zfycm024/2S8zKMdQc8J3w=; b=gITKmxxDhgIMh0GBSjzrYXob4xH5ac4x30bNOUfhP52jgJ4KWwbkVbvAhfB0+FFPCl NWmC6YWh8Aj3a6azln/sOq2CaxgN3x2Q2KiP5C14kicaKqx7Hgy5du54iXPfmyu8m/QD vY2mU4oONUgQCmqn9uZ7ASUybjvcYHGGpXOMOXboVWPkWeo8g7lm4CDD+w7ed+yQb142 7HIzFpKUrqPD/FjJ9iuJLW2vios035TKRfqtwdkAFI/0vhHquQcfHyG2dIplqeuuDycw aDCsMGRGzKJhgRyZ/LCx53OFoYe9OmfXC5d0HwagUWv7OCXJIIanfTw59kG3VxnO9JTz 5jDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3yE+UfcHa7mipzkghSGZ/HUf3MHh8B4UyzUid384ano9VRda29tKIq7G6Y66pIeQOMBKU
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.145.145 with SMTP id su17mr5641735oeb.59.1423814733757; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.77.71 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:05:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54DDAEF2.7020105@gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <9772.1420830216@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwZatYW2e4Wk6GXB2U26fsCn8BV2qt-07kHBugiq34zrcQ@mail.gmail.com> <6025.1423672358@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwYtE618sA99hgXP-5wk+BYdcXLbiZqd_36OreYQ1LB7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <732CCD31-0F13-472F-9825-C5F5D650C41B@vigilsec.com> <2457EE06-4960-40B5-AF10-2EDFBF18B2B6@nominum.com> <7C601AA4-55C4-43FE-B2FE-1D22BD73F166@vigilsec.com> <54DDAEF2.7020105@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:05:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzwbCPqmNM7HbyMdSU2eGnr+Y7yjupo=F1nidcK=Et0rFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d30d86e952b050ef3b335
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/L4Xpk8Y2sTGn068D864A5esxVnw>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:05:44 -0000

On 13 February 2015 at 07:59, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2/12/15 7:40 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> > We disagree.  Many people tell us (on the IAOC surveys) that the most
> > important thing that happens at IETF meetings is the hallway
> > conversations.  It is a significant part of the culture.
>
> I think there's a cultural thing at work - it appears to be increasingly
> the case that IETF culture requires meetings and face-to-face
> discussion.


And what do you expect when we make it absolutely clear that this is the
only thing that counts?