Re: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]

Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> Sat, 14 February 2015 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2B51A0217 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:44:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJ1quM4fd_rf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:44:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com (mail-la0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F9DA1A01D8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:44:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by labgm9 with SMTP id gm9so22550321lab.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:44:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fH84S5feS6+V/Erqh+YeNOrwzSW+44xOMnlE53U1lnw=; b=i5t3nByWeN1/+emMBKuc/MARaSjP0F6Lqz+irQacSyGbadlRgt6lIXNbqrB1mnHUuF WhpPAVV10CJWYy7sgazE6E1AaHpGPa21VWyvI2dE6gSqkIG6pWusVAZwRmc0eFTgHEfB WCSNhYGUnxVxXfUUVe9aaHOPQWbxuHu3ZocEJXR6BTLCldDpKKXjNQcArvwoLhFcpZOT avIyHcTK6QE1Tn+5TmPckB8vQNxmS32Ijz7esp4sBhXEJLl4sIBl4es+aP4n/JqJlRtl dbxXLy59ZDl/1wkyc4CemBAcGJO7XGMxZqXPGtHq03XAvEt87G3ONM6es6mhmvkMjjnu qloA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.7.101 with SMTP id i5mr15159725laa.122.1423953840131; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:44:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.40.133 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:44:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <71F05D3C-95F1-4424-B6AA-49EBCCB7065A@isoc.org>
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <9772.1420830216@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwZatYW2e4Wk6GXB2U26fsCn8BV2qt-07kHBugiq34zrcQ@mail.gmail.com> <6025.1423672358@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwYtE618sA99hgXP-5wk+BYdcXLbiZqd_36OreYQ1LB7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <54DBD71C.20101@joelhalpern.com> <26803.1423772214@sandelman.ca> <tsla90ikh85.fsf@mit.edu> <37661D4B-1842-4890-88FB-2A7B13CDC884@nominum.com> <CABmDk8m1KuSs8os9V7fcYOJC2O4yMb6dRFer+nEPBTTSHtey9Q@mail.gmail.com> <31891031-4628-49CD-B66C-38A3BD787B70@trammell.ch> <54DE7F09.8030500@gmail.com> <C5FC0DB6-82F8-4C38-ABFD-D5D9A6E65933@isoc.org.ec> <54DE90C6.6030609@gmail.com> <E39AF4E0-58AB-4249-8A37-3D1CD2D5A691@gmail.com> <54DE9844.1010807@gmail.com> <61FBB27B-4EF3-40A0-8981-00EB89698295@isoc.org.ec> <B90F5E29-06C5-41D1-9F31-1BE42382995F@gmail.com> <CABmDk8=YPZ1W2tTOqP23U2PFVLoDh-3+wwmcA8mpta-Y05op2A@mail.gmail.com> <54DFBAF6.30409@cs.tcd.ie> <71F05D3C-95F1-4424-B6AA-49EBCCB7065A@isoc.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:44:00 -0600
Message-ID: <CABmDk8kAwf0zjE2AMLFTUe7CY4bjnfHaFTPhR69Vfm_AnkqH2A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]
From: Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c296ecd155e5050f1416be
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hTwFboUae9NoJJb-50YAPUslL4c>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Carlos Vera Quintana <cveraq@gmail.com>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 22:44:04 -0000

Ray,

Please read my response to Stephen.  I didn't at all suggest what he seems
to have interpreted me
to have done.

Regards,
Mary.

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Ray
>
>
> > On Feb 14, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 14/02/15 18:21, Mary Barnes wrote:
> >> And, actually this is already happening with Meetecho.
> >
> > I think we ought forget about charging for remote attendance until
> > remote attendance is much better. Remotely attending IETF-91 via
> > meetecho was a good bit better than I expected but is nowhere near
> > the point where we could charge. Let's make it work first, and then
> > see how that affects attendance and then figure out charging models
> > and not try do that backwards by starting to discuss charging models
> > for something that doesn't yet exist.
> >
> > S.
> >
>