Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Sat, 10 January 2015 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C462B1A0373 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:33:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MISSING_MID=0.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0m1-zHX5cKb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 144141A00F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.243]) by resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id eJZB1p0015FMDhs01JZJga; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:33:18 +0000
Received: from Mike-T530ssd.comcast.net ([69.255.115.150]) by resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id eJZH1p00J3Em2Kp01JZJ6P; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:33:18 +0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:33:38 -0500
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>,ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
In-Reply-To: <5237.1420905553@sandelman.ca>
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <9772.1420830216@sandelman.ca> <54B02B51.1070308@cs.tcd.ie> <5237.1420905553@sandelman.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1420914798; bh=WLyjeINeWREI6OpsMXVMCz1vl0zYNNaV4sxIUlME6K8=; h=Received:Received:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=O2uprQZyW+zLR+L9PDRIY1VhLv7BTwp+gUztqTflMreRYdczqeZyMTtFFD9EwipK3 fwu+L6TwV1e0i9UPiLg4ARnKwHUv+CDp+YqJYpKMwDRlVULYoA8S52KtgOeN+BU0E2 7CjpgOSlnQSz/dhZooCNXIJuMKaCoE7Rv9ShDDbIm54sEwyMBL/Y/wMeunu/BpjL63 QhFIdkRGWgfGliPQLEFqRsxhBkUbd80789+P/Sumy/A80yQrW/lunrH1CD0u83RVUv O3NKaj2Bc1xnSnIOpiki8GzbthbGwkwhVdu9DJsUnWujCZifFVZwD6DxTiIKV+9QIf r9/lcsSp5btYw==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xgxn0J7jhLBmasehmIus-f_E1Iw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:33:20 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20150110183323.19731.96271.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>

At 10:59 AM 1/10/2015, Michael Richardson wrote:
>That's why I wrote "contribution" --- we could imagine some system of points,
>with the datatracker being the scoreboard, but I'm not clear that we need an
>particularly complex system or overly restrictive system.

But we do need - my strongly held opinion -  an "objective" one and that's harder to craft with respect to the definition of "contribution".  Whereas simply counting meetings is objective and repeatable.


To be honest, I foresee a spate of throw away IDs being crafted to be counted as contributions and that might not be all that useful for our process.

Later, Mike