Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

[Michael StJohns <[e-mail]>]

At 10:59 AM 1/10/2015, Michael Richardson wrote:
>That's why I wrote "contribution" --- we could imagine some system of points,
>with the datatracker being the scoreboard, but I'm not clear that we need an
>particularly complex system or overly restrictive system.

But we do need - my strongly held opinion -  an "objective" one and that's harder to craft with respect to the definition of "contribution".  Whereas simply counting meetings is objective and repeatable.


To be honest, I foresee a spate of throw away IDs being crafted to be counted as contributions and that might not be all that useful for our process.

Later, Mike