Re: Concerns about Singapore

[Michael StJohns <[e-mail]>]

On 4/10/2016 10:45 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> it was clean unfettered Internet.  some local folk stuck their necks out
>>> very far to accomplish this.  it was definitely different than one got
>>> outside of the ietf meeting network.  this has been a condition placed
>>> on hosts and beijing was no exception.
>> This surprises me - "this has been a condition placed on hosts...".
> it was even in the hour of embarrassing babble fred used to prevent
> people from talking about real problems at the bof
>
>> Could you enlighten us as to which [and I'll try to be precise here]
>> other IETFs had a condition where the content accessible by the IETF
>> network was markedly different from the content of say the network at
>> a local Starbuck's equivalent wifi hot spot just down the street from
>> the IETF and where that was mandated by the hosts and/or local laws?
>> I mean besides Beijing?  Key words "markedly different" and "content
>> accessible".
> we don't specify it's 'different'.  among other silly distractions, it
> would require a 'different from precisely what and in what ways?'
>
> we simply specifiy open and unfettered

I repeat - "where" have the local hosts/laws specified conditions that 
resulted in the IETF network content access being markedly different 
than that accessible to the random local citizen?


>
> rndy