IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concerns about Singapore

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sat, 09 April 2016 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A75212D14C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xiqWRz_vWMeq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6042012D0E0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id i4so57751619qkc.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HSINzQCsBMVkuB75UFxNM2tqp+J4WRVi7SFQuc6f+z8=; b=LWFP9p+5xl4BmPEF0EdRiROZ/B4OuyZRWTp3g9UkFUQX6iYGzjqkud9z20Ymx/MOzn Wk6ScQ/V2mOORtzM+bgZZqRvOLu50aRdaObujWwDgf6nXiZqDK+eAHttFFe1dMCYBhDt fobPlt+wvF2zxLwpESxUv6AGMDcBrJkVKTHF5XhTibqRbMZociShDVE6tdv/sn9Q1n73 zPf+utmxdaqrL1CB6XoOKVLjcxuLgvDbXr0QyMzJdKf4NKDWMZloNf6hn5quzNxdKQDy 1vRqXFLuGvLFfFVBb6B0YBvOWhNps2EDbFoBKHy/NERAchJSzIGhNM5FCBX8tcAVmrea RXSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HSINzQCsBMVkuB75UFxNM2tqp+J4WRVi7SFQuc6f+z8=; b=Fe9jJNNEN9D7+AIokUl1QX0WY2+SDS5P1LdzY6IlJ3R7nQGNT/K3wafH91VLK5DTTT iSoBNfZGvFOLnlryIS0BeoO+5xvM2y8h+4MGdV94gJ+cDZuUCJPef3s19f/LAFabNs0g uOvYboFyUqWbwJTuos+QZ6MdWod1S4axDHCixlMN+fSEas6KMjOI/fNZLBWd1ljw6vZY lSl+wJTw6t7U2l3Z9RexGuF1dQrrgmObNuruUo+1H3dYWLL6llr7BRTq8RlQxYtSyjT5 YXZBxmMV6izHb+R4iJDvnh/dS5vTl6Ea3F7tjdyBdMw/RISL0UM2fQLnLk5rr/Ii2ebX lb4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJqH+gpIrwWbxfErywHmgfG7FF5rHPuQpxVwjj02J1PEIeItcoPxj2fa8gfdn0QK8QNis2jsGkXkbZ1Bvgq
X-Received: by 10.55.72.86 with SMTP id v83mr19955241qka.72.1460244755430; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se> <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com> <9B723FB0-6B93-4C85-ADD9-D423F873CF08@virtualized.org> <20160409155300.6283348.41255.10529@blackberry.com> <ADC8666A-436C-4AD4-BD48-9277601069F8@gmail.com> <57093CD3.3050502@gmail.com> <f5b1ceec-4cd5-55b5-5089-4a499ed0586c@bogus.com> <F2D3ACF5-C7BD-4D0C-8518-665D2EDAA6CA@cisco.com> <570955E3.2010205@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1604091401420.42313@rabdullah.local> <429DD401-DB4F-4B09-9EF8-035EFB089488@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <429DD401-DB4F-4B09-9EF8-035EFB089488@frobbit.se>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 23:32:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLfBv-dzJcpqJdVwoMCjaK37JH0WimzWec4v4QaprpowA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
To: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11487656eee5eb053015b976"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RwUlhoTEPZ8BfETCK3v-BsGLaOM>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 23:32:39 -0000

ICANN has also met in Sengal and Morocco recently -- while I didn't hear of
any issues there either, they are not exactly shining bastions in the human
rights areas. Just because we didn't hear about issues doesn't mean people
were comfortable there...

W

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 7:36 PM Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:

> On 9 Apr 2016, at 23:05, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>
> > There are several sources online for this information, including the
> > US State Department, but we are also actively seeking clarification
> > from contacts in Singapore about these issues. So far, I am fairly
> > certain that our attendees won't notice any issues at all, but stay
> > tuned as we gather the facts.
>
> FWIW, ICANN has met in Singapore a few times recently and I have not heard
> about any issues what so ever.
>
>    Patrik
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email