IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore)

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 12 April 2016 00:30 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD45D12F60E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydXYHlRlSQv4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C4612D7C1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F19C1FCAE5; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:30:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8AEA160073; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4248160072; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Ai1WpLlXmhn3; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c122-106-161-187.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.161.187]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92043160053; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1739C461BB18; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:30:25 +1000 (EST)
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <m260vp7eke.wl%randy@psg.com> <570A6458.3050206@comcast.net> <m21t6d7c9t.wl%randy@psg.com> <570A67B4.3010206@comcast.net> <570AB3AF.2050401@gmail.com> <87twj99c6w.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <CAKe6YvMyp-DyeDwpPY6KYmbDbnpgnvVk_cUStnA32wmgDWcz3w@mail.gmail.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233A62AA18@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <20160411104519.GA19092@gsp.org> <3F48466D-390C-4C18-B958-732AE3E46FF1@gmail.com> <20160411223403.GA6743@gsp.org> <570C2985.9030701@cs.tcd.ie> <CAN-Dau0JzMNrUFU6baX1=M4FtfF85oEkyr7PmSbt5TBNPMHumQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1kKMDvZt6K_QxRt4SVbzw6FOjkXH2fFbntxWn28i=NLfA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns about Singapore)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:13:07 -0400." <CAPt1N1kKMDvZt6K_QxRt4SVbzw6FOjkXH2fFbntxWn28i=NLfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:30:25 +1000
Message-Id: <20160412003025.1739C461BB18@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Xoiu7ZoCemEdewUoY27S-oJmhyE>
Cc: IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:30:33 -0000

I also have no doubt one could do a 1000 person remote meeting.

That being said, I've tried to do remote attendence at meetings
both where there is a small timezone offset and a large timezone
offset.  The small timezone offset "works" but in no way replaces
face to face meetings.  The large timezone offset only works if you
have 1 or 2 working groups to want to attend.

Face to face forces attendees to be mostly in sync with respect to
the timezone.  BA was a 10 hour shift for me but it was do able.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email