IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Tue, 24 April 2012 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBC911E8096 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.407, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MTjYaZz+0lDo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.204]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E842921F85A2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail48-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.249) by AM1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.3.204.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:31:08 +0000
Received: from mail48-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail48-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EC830033A; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:31:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -6
X-BigFish: PS-6(zz1432N98dKzz1202h1082kzz8275bhz2fh2a8h668h839h944he5bh)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0710HT001.namprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received-SPF: pass (mail48-am1: domain of stewe.org designates 157.56.240.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.133; envelope-from=stewe@stewe.org; helo=BL2PRD0710HT001.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail48-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail48-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1335310266263560_30333; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS004.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.240]) by mail48-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BC84C00D8; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0710HT001.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.133) by AM1EHSMHS004.bigfish.com (10.3.207.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:31:04 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0710MB349.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.136]) by BL2PRD0710HT001.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.102.36]) with mapi id 14.16.0143.004; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:31:02 +0000
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Robin Uyeshiro <uyeshiro@IfA.Hawaii.Edu>, "mrex@sap.com" <mrex@sap.com>, 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Thread-Topic: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Thread-Index: AQHNIlUvjZjf8LqBG0mFd9z/BVSRBJaqhFaAgAAYboD//43UgA==
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:31:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CBBC8454.86387%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <747A174C9AEE4BE60CDDBA77@JCK-EEE10>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.102.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <176345957370A44498954815A63235C8@namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: stewe.org
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:31:13 -0000

Remember, this whole discussion is about a) taking pictures, and b)
publishing them.  Avoid either, and we should be completely save.  Do
both, and it still takes at least one person to take offense to the point
where he calls police or runs to a lawyer, proof, a judge finding that the
privacy rights of the person have been violated, and so on.
People take pictures in meetings all the time, in Germany and elsewhere.
Folks exceed the speed limit (yes, even in Germany large stretches of the
freeway system and all other roads have a speed limit :-).  In either
case, many say that the risk is in an acceptable relationship with the
benefits.
Stephan


On 4.24.2012 16:19 , "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

>
>
>--On Tuesday, 24 April, 2012 11:52 -1000 Robin Uyeshiro
><uyeshiro@IfA.Hawaii.Edu> wrote:
> 
>> <snip>
>> The issue with John's purpose is that he is taking a picture
>> of the audience(!), and if you take such a picture from the
>> front in a small meeting room, there might a small number of
>> folks end up _prominently_ in the foreground of that picture,
>> at which point their consent will be required.
>
>Again, IANAL and I don't think you are either, so I don't want
>to argue "prominently" versus "non-prominently".  I can assure
>that, when pictures were used, the clear intent was the everyone
>with his or her hand up was individually identifiable and almost
>everyone else was too.
>
>   john
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email