IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Tue, 24 April 2012 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0F521E809A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.866
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.866 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.767, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DoXPLlY269yb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F21021E8015 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail45-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.240) by AM1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.3.204.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:06 +0000
Received: from mail45-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail45-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C04E0440; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -6
X-BigFish: PS-6(zzc89bh1432N98dKzz1202h1082kzz8275bhz2fh2a8h668h839he5bh)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0710HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received-SPF: pass (mail45-am1: domain of stewe.org designates 157.56.240.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.133; envelope-from=stewe@stewe.org; helo=BL2PRD0710HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail45-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail45-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 133529244565135_26236; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.237]) by mail45-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F0C8006E; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0710HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.133) by AM1EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (10.3.207.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:02 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0710MB349.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.136]) by BL2PRD0710HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.102.38]) with mapi id 14.16.0143.004; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:00 +0000
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: "mrex@sap.com" <mrex@sap.com>, Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Thread-Topic: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Thread-Index: AQHNIkV3jZjf8LqBG0mFd9z/BVSRBJap17YA
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:33:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CBBC3EDB.8630D%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <201204241810.q3OIA1cI004757@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.102.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <A5B65F02FE63154EB62A15A13144FD0F@namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: stewe.org
Cc: "john-ietf@jck.com" <john-ietf@jck.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:09 -0000

I believe Martin is correct, at least with respect to Germany.
OTOH, "wo kein Kläger, da kein Richter" (no plaintiff, no judge).  And:
where is the damage?  In short, I wouldn't worry too much.
Stephan

On 4.24.2012 11:10 , "Martin Rex" <mrex@sap.com> wrote:

>Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> 
>> Michael StJohns wrote:
>> >
>> > Martin - you and everyone else in the room gave permission by being in
>> > the room.  That's what the NOTE WELL is all about.  So no, not
>>illegal. 
>> 
>> Specifically every registered attendee has accepted during the
>> registration process the note-well.
>
>You're completely misled.
>
>In Germany (and probably all over Europe) that part of note well
>will not apply to the rights about your own picture/portrait.
>
>To obtain such a right, a seperate explicit and voluntary consent
>is required.  That is a privilege guaranteed by law.
>
>-Martin
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email