IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C43221F85A1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nbvl6qJknWCk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C14421F84B3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1SMp7J-000D9n-Ma; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:25:53 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:30:51 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, mrex@sap.com
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Message-ID: <AE015D7E36663F8F0DD4314F@JCK-EEE10>
In-Reply-To: <201204242319.q3ONJFQA003966@mtv-core-1.cisco.com>
References: <D4345C087CD29FF2165406B7@JCK-EEE10> <201204242217.q3OMHCls018770@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp> <201204242319.q3ONJFQA003966@mtv-core-1.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:30:55 -0000

--On Tuesday, 24 April, 2012 18:19 -0500 "James M. Polk"
<jmpolk@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> IETF 87 is in Germany (15 months from now), so we'd better
> solve this issue soon, I should think.

The IESG and IAOC are invited to take my comments on the
situation as an appeal against the decision to hold that meeting
unless either the situation can be clarified with counsel to the
degree that we understand that Martin's concerns are not
applicable, that appropriate permission language and permissions
can be clarified with Counsel so that a binding between
registration and permission is possible and used, or that a
community consensus call demonstrates that the community
believes that the "just make lists" plan is preferable to having
the option to take pictures.

And that is my last comment on the subject unless I have to
formalize such an appeal.

   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email